Syria: White House preaches peace as Pentagon preps for war
Published: 08 February, 2012, 17:23
Edited: 21 February, 2012, 08:08
A US Marine Corps F-35 Lightening II multirole fighter jet is escorted by two USMC F-18 Hornets as it flies towards Eglin Air Force Base, Florida in this U.S. Air Force handout photo dated January 11, 2012 (Reuters / DoD / U.S. Air Force / Staff Sgt. Joely Santiago / Handout)
TAGS: Arms, Military, UN, Russia, Protest, Politics, China, USA, Opposition, War, Syria
The White House is saying “no” to arming opposition and other military involvement in the Syrian conflict – for the moment. Pentagon and US Central Command launched a review of US military capabilities in case that “no” turns a “yes.”
The backdoor for military action was ajar with State Department, spokesman Victoria Nuland saying that US never takes any option off the table, even though they “don't think more arms into Syria is the answer." It appears the Pentagon has a similar view, as it has reportedly launched a full-scale review of its available military might.
Two senior administration officials told CNN that “options are being prepared in the event President Barack Obama was to call for them.” Support for opposition groups and outright military strikes are among the options being looked at.
This type of planning exercise is typical for the Pentagon, which would not want to be in the position of not having options for the president, if and when they are asked for, both officials told CNN. One of them called the effort a “scoping exercise,” with Pentagon looking into what capabilities are available given other US military commitments in the region.
US President Barack Obama said in an interview Sunday that he believes it is possible to resolve the conflict peacefully “without recourse to outside military intervention.” However, some congressional lawmakers, including Arizona's Republican Senator John McCain, called for the US to explore the prospect of arming opposition forces in Syria.
"We should start considering options, arming the opposition," McCain said. "The bloodletting has got to stop."
The US and other Western powers are wary of engaging closely with would-be rebel forces without the legal protection of UN resolution, similar to the one that was passed in the case of Libya. But in the wake of Russia and China vetoing a Security Council resolution calling for Syrian President Bashar Assad to step down, they are forced to look for other solutions.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has called Sunday for "friends of democratic Syria" to unite and rally against Assad's regime. She has also vowed to strengthen existing sanctions against the Syrian regime and seek further ones to dry up funding and arms shipments.
"We will work to seek regional and national sanctions against Syria. They will be implemented to the fullest to dry up the sources of funding and the arms shipments that are keeping the regime's war machine going," Clinton told journalists. “We will work with the friends of a democratic Syria around the world to support the opposition’s peaceful political plans for change.”
Clinton did not specify who those “friends of a democratic Syria” are, but it could be that the United States proceeds to form a group of like-minded nations to coordinate assistance to the Syrian opposition.
Elena Ostroumova, RT
08.02, 17:15
14 comments
Legal framework required to stop CIA drone carnageСIA drones are attacking funeral processions and civilian and Taliban rescue teams in Pakistan. A staggering report exposing the practice has outraged NGOs and legal experts, who are demanding international laws to govern drone warfare. |
08.02, 17:33
32 comments
This is how we roll: FSA shows off APC (VIDEO)Syrian rebels are rolling out armored hardware in their battle against government forces, if this footage is an indicator of the situations in Homs. Syria unrest |
Strange how the people pushing for war war and more war with Syria get money from Israeli lobby groups.
From what I've seen in my lifetime, the most ignorant statements come from those who have no context. They might have heard something or read something, but were not alive, or were very young, when the event actually happened. The major powers of the world have committed many sins and as a result have to resort to military involvement to atone for them.
Meaning, they place leaders in power that are meant to control a certain people and resource for the benefit of said major power. This has a near 100% failure rate. Usually, in order to control the people and resources, the leader has to put the thumb screws to the people. Other times, they just enjoy doing that...at any rate, the people eventually rise up in opposition and the major power has to come clean up the mess.
Especially true once past the 20 year mark.
I, for one, sincerely hope this era of tampering in the lives and autonomy of the worlds people will end soon, but not until all of the messes have been cleaned up.







i don't see any justification for syrian government, but i see how russian government sorrowly tries not to lose the last friendly,close stat in near east, it's clear that they make some money out from there, also selling weapons to those who kill own cityzens with that weapon, usa, also need the platsdarm to strike iran, i somehow see justification for usa, it deffinetily won't be good for the rest of world iranian nuclear weapon.