SNC ‘halfway to recognition’ by Friends of Syria
Published: 25 February, 2012, 03:56
Edited: 25 February, 2012, 19:01
Burhan Ghalioun (C), President of the SNC, at the Friends of Syria Conference in Tunis, on February 24, 2012 (AFP Photo / Pool / Jason Reed)
TAGS: Conflict, Meeting, UN, Politics, Human rights, Syria
The Friends of Syria meeting in Tunisia has gone halfway to recognizing the Syria’s opposition umbrella group the National Council as legitimate representatives of the Syrian people. And promised more pressure and sanctions on the existing regime.
The Syrian National Council (SNC) was recognized as a legitimate representative of the Syrian people, although not the sole representative.
Other representatives of increasingly fragmented Syrian opposition groups were invited, including the Damascus-based National Coordination Committee. The NCC boycotted the meeting because it would not rule out the idea of military intervention.
But the Tunisian foreign minister, who chaired the conference, promised Western and Arab powers will probably fully recognize the Syrian National Council during the next meeting of the Friends of Syria group in Turkey.
"We have gone half the way and we will probably do the other half in Turkey,"stressed Rafik Abdessalem.
The conference called for an immediate end to violence and promised more sanctions on the regime of President Assad. It urged t'o allow free and unimpeded access by the UN and humanitarian agencies,” a final declaration issued by the group said.
However the meeting’s final document did not recommend military intervention or arming the rebels, both of which actions were called for by the Syrian opposition and some other countries.
The SNC has called on the international community to arm the rebels.
"The Friends of Syria should not constrain individual countries from aiding the Syrian opposition by means of military advisers, training and provision of arms to defend themselves,"the group said in a seven-point statement of demands.
But many Arab states which traditionally have had friendly ties with President Bashar Assad’s administration feel that further militarizing the crisis would tip Syria into a dangerous sectarian quagmire that could destabilize the whole region.
This left the Syrian opposition disappointed with its chief, Burhan Ghalioun, saying"This conference does not meet the aspirations of the Syrian people,"Reuters reports.
The Saudi foreign minister went further than others during the meeting by calling it"an excellent idea" for weapons and ammunition to be sent to the opposition, including the Free Syrian Army.
Meanwhile, Qatari Foreign Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim Al-Thani called for intervention.
"There is a need to create an Arab force and open humanitarian corridors to provide security to the Syrian people,"he said.
The Friends of Syria also committed to ratchet up sanctions on Syria. These would include travel bans on senior Syrian officials, freezing their assets, boycotting Syrian oil, suspending investments and preventing arms supplies to the government.
France added that the European Union would on Monday freeze assets of Syria's national bank held in EU jurisdictions while US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton vowed that already tough US penalties would be strengthened.
Following the meeting, Clinton slammed Russia and China for their opposition to UN Security Council action on Syria, calling it“despicable.”
Russia and China boycotted the Friends of Syria conference saying it was biased in favor of regime change in Syria. Moscow and Beijing insist that pressure should be also put on the armed opposition.
Meanwhile, US President Barack Obama issued his most forceful comment to date on the Syrian crisis saying the US and its allies would use“every tool available”to end the violence. "We're going to continue to keep the pressure up and look for every tool available to prevent the slaughter of innocents in Syria,"he told reporters at the White House.
‘Only political solution will resolve Syrian crisis’ – UN chief
The UN chief underlined that only a political solution will solve the crisis in the country.
“The crisis in Syria did not start with calls for regime change,” UN head Ban Ki-moon pointed out. “People wanted reform and an end to oppression, exclusion and marginalization.”
Ban addressed the conference held in the Tunisian capital in a message delivered by Lynn Pascoe, the under secretary general for political affairs on Friday.
“It is essential to avoid further militarization and a descent towards sectarian strife,” he said.
Ban Ki-moon also stressed that the UN’s guiding principles are non-violence, national ownership, democracy, respect for human rights, accountability, impartiality and the independence of humanitarian assistance.“I expect the international community to act in a coherent and consistent manner to facilitate a peaceful resolution of the crisis.”
The conference in Tunis was not legitimate as the Syrian government was not involved, Abayomi Azikiwe, editor of the Pan-African News Wire, told RT. “They are not interested in a peace settlement; they are mainly interested in regime change in Syria.”
Azikiwe also believes that the US and the UK are behind Saudi Arabia’s stance on arming the rebels. “The United States and Britain actually want the government in Syria overthrown as a precursory for further aggressive and hostile actions against the Islamic Republic of Iran.”
Watch RT's interview with Abayomi Azikiwe
25.02, 00:36
6 comments
'Bangkok bombings not linked to attacks in India and Georgia'Thai police say they have not found any connections between the recent explosions in Bangkok and the attacks on Israeli diplomats in India and Georgia. Israel has repeatedly accused Iran of being behind the bombings. |
25.02, 10:14
11 comments
Kyrgyz headscarf of discordCan the state force Muslim women not to wear a veil in public? The debate is as hot in France and Turkey as it is in Central Asia’s Kyrgyzstan. The country is facing a rise of conservative Islam, with its restrictions, which worries many people. |
@GREATBRITAIN It is not a matter of belief that the Zionists (Jewish and others) are behind every major problem we are faced with today, whether it be Syria, Lybia, Afghanistan or Iraq....
People recognize these facts and even a blind Freddy, like yourself would acknowledge these facts if you had any decency.
And as far as the Protocols are concerned, again, it isn't a matter of belief but evaluation of facts written some hundred years ago and proven to be factual whether they are original or rewritten or copied;
the proof is in the pudding, as they say.
Despite all the disinformation perpetrated by the Zionist media, the people of the world are more and more grasping the reality of the situation and are rightfully expressing their dissatisfaction.
Stop using this worn out victim propaganda; us and Hitler...
No, I never liked Hitler.
Hitler was financed by the Zionist Rothschilds in order to help them establish the Zionist state of Israel.
Do your research - I have done mine. There are decent Jewish people who share my view. Not all Jewish people are Zionists.
I am not pro-religious in favour of Alawites and/or Christian Syrians, I only believe that, in this so-called modern world there must not be any persecution of people based on their religious creed. Concerning the organisation of the State, I believe any modern state must be secular, and impartial in authorising people to pratctice their religion. On the other hand there must not be any religious-based parties, as religion must not interfere with politics. Religion is all about believing in God, love and tolerance. Whenever religion enters politics, it preaches hate and violence (Tea Parties anyone? Wahhabi and Salafists? They are all the same face of hate and violence who say that they believe in their own "God" and they only "convert" people to their cause with ignorance, hate and violence)
The final point is: it is unbelievable that support for these terrorist thugs of Lybia and Syria who would exterminate people of a different religion or political view comes from such "champions" of democracy and "human rights" such as the EU and the U.S. Considering events (to name just a few) such as the banksters mafia, the unending warmongering (pardon, "humanitarian interventions" - with live bombs) of NATO, repressive fascist laws such as NDAA, ACTA, SOPA, PIPA, and events such as the burning of the Koran, which in other news comments of RT I called NATO literarally shooting itself in its foot, do you think that anyone who has got a brain is so stupid to believe all this endless collection of BS? EU/NATO/Banksters your credibility is well below zero and falling







Micolr, do not make fool of yourself.
Arabs ARE SEMITS in contrast to 90% of Israels Ashkenazis (descendents of Khazars) and other converts who are absolutely not.
It is as if you call an Eskimo (sorry, all Eskimos for an insult ) a jew after converting to Judaism.