VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   News   Stolen by Swedish social services: Russian mother slams authorities for taking twins  
MORE ON THE STORY
01.06.2010, 23:09 2 comments

Russian mum faces prison if her kid again runs from Finnish orphanage

An international battle has been raging between a Russian mother and a Finnish father fighting for custody of their 10 year-old girl.

15.04.2010, 14:23 21 comments

US suspended from adopting Russian children

Moscow has suspended the adoption of Russian children by American families until the two countries sign an agreement on how the well-being of the children is safeguarded.

02.04.2010, 23:10 1 comment

Russian woman declared mother of the daughter she never had

A Russian court has obliged a woman to pay child support for a daughter she never had. Luckily, the woman managed to win the case.

Stolen by Swedish social services: Russian mother slams authorities for taking twins

Published: 01 February, 2011, 09:21
Edited: 05 February, 2011, 21:08

(15.9Mb) embed video

TAGS: Children, Conflict, Europe, Human rights, Anissa Naouai


It has been over a month since Natalya, a Russian citizen living in Sweden, has seen her twin girls Masha and Nelly.

“My children are in someone else’s hands…they were stolen…I don’t know what’s happening with them or how they’re being treated,” says their mother Natalya Petrova.

A mother’s worst nightmare: her children taken from where they are supposed to be most safe -and not by kidnappers or child abusers but by the Swedish government.

Natalya’s twin girls were taken out of a music lesson at school without warning and for an entire week she had no idea where her daughters were until she received documents from social services which she says were full of false statements about the family’s life.

The complaints filed against Natalya claim she and the girls are psychologically troubled and could be enough to send her daughters into foster care for good under Swedish law without sufficient proof.

But according to the family lawyer Jenny Beltran, nothing illegal was done.

“It is considered legal because the law, it's a protection law, protection for the children. So it means that even if there is a slightest risk, even if there is no evidence, sort of there are no witnesses, there is nothing, but there is a risk of something happening, then the law, the social workers within the law are able to take the child to a social office and take them away from the family,” says Beltran.

Natalya has been advised by Human rights activists that this is only part of a much bigger welfare system and that she is not alone in her fight to prevent her girls from going to a foster family.

The activists are accusing the Swedish authorities of separating innocent families for monetary gains.

“Often people have relatives or friends working in social services and these friends or relatives help them to get foster children. We have cases where social services have been paid 10.000 Swedish Crowns per day that's about 1200 euros per day for one single child. That is 3.65 million Swedish Crowns per year – over 30,000 euros per year to take care of one child,” says Ruby Harrold-Claesson, president of the Nordic Committee for Human Rights.

Swedish social services said they were unable to comment to RT on Natalya’s case due to their privacy policy.

“They steal, they don’t only steal children but money, apartments, property and children are human goods to them,” Natalya accuses social services. 

With poor Swedish language skills, a lawyer appointed by social services and little money, Natalya has been told the chances of getting her girls back are slim and that they are most likely now with a Swedish family.

“It's just huge machinery so as an individual you are very small against sort of this whole machinery because they have also, I mean, you get your lawyer, but the social services they have so much, not just money, but also all kinds of help to get assistance in order to do these investigations, it's not equal in a way sort of your defending yourself as a, as a parent,” thinks Jenny Beltran.

Natalya should be protected by International laws and conventions but loopholes in the Swedish system allow cases like this to go unnoticed.

“Sweden is a consensus country and people are not prone to speak up against the consensus they are very quiet in this way…the consensus is that the state is always right,” says Professor of  international law, Jacob Sundberg.

He is Persona non grata in Sweden for his outspoken views on the system.

Sundberg says social services can take children away using their own criteria by working together with doctors, psychologist and lawyers…all wrapped up in a big business.

“Say you have six foster children, well you can make a fortune,” Sundberg explains.

For now all Natalya can do is wait for the hearing on her case which so far has been postponed several times.

 “Their birthday is coming up…Where will my children be?…They already missed Christmas,” says the twins’ mother. 

And they will miss turning 13 this week at home with their mother who Sweden has decided is – at least for now… not going to be their mom.

+3 (7 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
EGYPT, Cairo : An Egyptian army soldier joins a crowd of Muslim demonstrators during a prayer at the Tahrir square in central Cairo January 30. (AFP Photo / Marco Longari) 31.01.2011, 23:11

“ElBaradei suits everyone but only as an interim leader”- Russian political analysts

Amid ongoing violence in Egypt, political analysts all over the world try to predict whether Mohhamed ElBaradei could be a compromise leader and finally oust President Mubarak.

Egypt unrest Arab world protests
Boris Yeltsin in office in Moscow, February 1989 01.02.2011, 09:58 7 comments

Yeltsin: epitome of 1990s Russia remembered

Russia is marking the 80th birthday of the man who took Perestroika to another level when the Soviet Union dissolved - Boris Yeltsin.

Portia March 03, 2011, 00:41
+2

This is legalised human trafficking. Who would have thought Sweden could use its children as a commodity to make money?
No better than slaves.
Thats my trip off to Sweden this year. I could not in conscience add a penny to their public purse and it be used to harm children like this.

I see these children as adults suing these pimps- for that is what they are.

C February 09, 2011, 12:52
+1

Just to update on how unreliable Social Services are. It was in the news that BRIS (Social Services that should help in urgencies) do not do enough to help children that request help. There were no details but I suspect that once you are a teenager or your cuteness expires the authorities are not bothered because children under 12 are more exploitable. In Sweden 12 year olds are allowed to make their own desitions and have the choice of who they want to live with.

Seems investing time, money and resources on impressionable kids is not worth it. Sometimes I think it is done on purpose. Sweden breeds missery. And they wonder why there are so many drug, alcohol, physical and mental abuse leading to suicide.

Roger Eldridge February 07, 2011, 14:50
0

It is clear that the rights of parents in Sweden are being violated. Strangely we are not told anything about the children's father or the marital status of the Family. Even though the Family founded on Marriage in Ireland is better protected from the sort of State interference this case represents all parents have the right to act responsibly towards their children. Only totalitarian States, like Sweden? do not respect parental rights and duties. We are told nothing about what happens to the many thousands of children taken into care in Sweden. Are they given to Married Families, to unmarried men or women, to two people of the same sex who can't have a child?
Sweden represents the frontier of the sort of child trafficking (legal) that the rest of the West can look forward to if the so-called Children's Rights lobby continue to fool the people into giving up their inalienable** and imperscriptible* rights as parents. (** incapable of being repudiated or transferred to another; * Not derived from, or dependent on, external authority; self-evidencing; obvious. Not capable of being lost or impaired by neglect, by disuse, or by the claims of another founded on prescription.)