New missile can beat any defence system
Published: 26 November, 2008, 17:04
RS-24
TAGS: SciTech
Russia’s military has tested a new-generation of intercontinental nuclear ballistic rocket. Defence sources say the RS-24, capable of carrying multiple independent warheads, can penetrate any defence system.
The missile was launched on November 26 from a mobile launcher at the northwestern Plesetsk Cosmodrome in Arkhangelsk region.
It reportedly travelled 6,000 miles across Russia to the Kamchatka Peninsula where the missile's multiple re-entry vehicles successfully landed on targets on the Kura testing range.
RS-24 is heavier than its predecessor – the RS-12 (Topol M), created in response to the missile shield that the United States wants to deploy in Europe.
The new rocket will replace ageing Ukrainian made RS-18 and RS-20 (known in NATO circles as the SS-19 Stiletto and the SS-18 Satan).
Together with the Topol-M (SS-27 by NATO designation) the new missile system will constitute the backbone of Russia’s strategic missile forces till 2050.
Lost NASA tool bag found! But by amateur astronomersAmateur astronomers in the U.S. have managed to find a tool bag, which NASA astronaut Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper lost during a space walk last week. |
28.11.2008, 15:10
1 comment
Crooks busted before offending - thanks to smart CCTVBritain is testing a CCTV system that may help identify criminals even before they offend. Critics say it's a step towards creating a society under total surveillance. |












Noooo - Can't we learn the lessons of the past Investing money in weapons - any weapons, let alone nuclear missiles doesn't make anything better. Small arms kill more people of course - unless the nukes are fired - but the nukes cause superpower tension, cold war, proxy conflicts, support for dictators - and because the resources are not being spent on the (comparatively cheap) things that make a difference - clean water, rule of law, availability of credit for the poorest - conflict and suffering continue. It's become a matter of pride for Russia to demonstrate the status of a first class power. But no one but a fool (and we have had several of those in high places in recent years) could think otherwise. No one has asked me, but if they did I's suggest the thing that would most make that clear would be to claim as much moral high ground as possible by uncynical foreign policy, and devoting resources to making things better rather than worse. A new generation of nuclear missile doesn't come into that category