VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   News   Sci-Tech   New cosmic ray data casts doubt on common theory  
MORE ON THE STORY
Strongest sun storm in years set to strike 18.02.2011, 09:37 2 comments

Strongest sun storm in years set to strike

Our planet is gearing up for its largest magnetic storm in years, which is due to arrive later on Friday. A number of scientists have warned of a possible technological disaster.

Mock mission to Mars reaches midpoint 18.02.2011, 14:16

Spacemen walk on “Mars” as mock mission reaches midpoint

Two space travelers are walking on a mock-up version of the surface of Mars – as part of a unique project simulating a trip to the Red Planet. It is the 260th day of the 520-day experiment.

Mars-500
Illustration by David Aguilar 18.01.2011, 14:17 5 comments

Hottest planet in galaxy spotted

The hottest-ever planet found by scientists so far is WASP 33 b orbiting a star some 380 light-years away in the constellation Andromeda.

New cosmic ray data casts doubt on common theory

Published: 04 March, 2011, 13:23

New cosmic ray data casts doubt on common theory

New cosmic ray data casts doubt on common theory

TAGS: Space, SciTech


Scientists studying data gathered by the cosmic ray detector PAMELA say the accepted theory on their origin may need to be corrected or completely eliminated.

Cosmic rays are steams of particles, mostly electrons, positrons and helium nuclei, with very high energy. Astronomers believe that they come from the remains of stars that go supernova. Such a catastrophic event produces strong magnetic fields, which linger for millennia and can serve as natural particle accelerators, producing cosmic rays.

PAMELA (Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Аstrophysics) is a cosmic ray detector mounted on a Russian earth surveillance satellite which has been collecting data since 2006. Now a group of Italian, Russian, Swedish and German scientists say the data is not in line with the previous theory.

In a paper published in Science magazine, the authors say the energy spectrum of the particles detected by PAMELA is too wide for all of them to have come from supernovae. The scientists speculate that at least some of the cosmic rays must have come from different sources somewhere closer to the Solar system. These sources may be stars similar in size to the Sun, but with higher activity, which can produce cosmic rays with lower energy that those produced by supernovae.

+16 (27 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
Revolutionary locomotive with atomic speed 18.02.2011, 19:06 14 comments

Revolutionary railroad: atomic train being developed in Russia

Russian Railways (RZhD) and the Russian Federal Atomic Energy Agency (Rosatom) intend to create a nuclear-powered train, reports Interfax.

Image from state-of-affairs.org 29.03.2011, 13:31 13 comments

Bug munches plastic trash, possibly cleaning oceans

Nature may have found a way to dispose of the huge amounts of plastic garbage, which has been increasingly accumulating in the oceans. A small bacteria feeding on it has been discovered. This may be a boon or a bane for the aquatic environment.

brightlight February 04, 2012, 09:22
+4

HOLD ON LET ME GET MY SUNGLASSES ,

fasoov October 16, 2011, 00:03
0

i've always considered any rays entering our radiation belts from 'out there'as being of cosmic origin!

John March 05, 2011, 16:40
+7

Talk about how to confuse science... I was always under the impression Cosmic Rays refered to the part of the EM Spectrum with shorter wavelength than "Gamma Rays" or higher energy "photons"  (quanta of EMF pruduced by an event of short enough duration to cause the burst of EMF to present the characteristics of a packet of energy with some particle like characteristics) believed to be produced by "cosmic" events alone. NOT very high energy beta and alpha PARTICLE  events or antimatter particle events. To lump all these completely different events together as "cosmic ray data" will of course cast doubt on common theory since they are all theoreticly peoduced by very different sub-atomic events anyway!

 

Diluting Cosmic Ray definition to include accelerated free electrons and helium nuclei and other high energy particles will just confuse those trying to understand Astro-Physics, lay-person or students of the discipline itself alike!