Satellite network meant to save the planet could cost the earth
Published: 07 July, 2010, 09:48
Edited: 14 July, 2010, 07:43
Russian astronomers have developed an innovative satellite network that would alert people when any space objects are on a collision course with the Earth. Some argue the system isn’t effective and is too expensive.
A large asteroid hitting the Earth could mean the worst natural disaster in millions of years – and threaten most forms of life.
“A giant tsunami wave will rise, submerging coastal cities. If a meteor hits land, a massive dust cloud will rise, and cause severe climate change,” Director of the Space Systems Research Centre, Valery Menshikov explains.
As a leading space engineer, Menshikov believes we have to do anything it takes to make sure this never happens.
His team has developed IGMASS, a groundbreaking network of satellites and telescopes on different continents. The system would give advance warning of anything from space on course for a collision, meaning that action could be taken to save the Earth.
“We need to radically increase the number of monitoring devices. If we spot an asteroid, we will need to blow it up or, more effectively, divert it from its course. We must act before it is too late,” the engineer says.
However, the proposed plan for a worldwide monitoring system has not been received enthusiastically. Critics say the price-tag for IGMASS could hit a meteoric $300 billion – and claim it will be a waste of money.
“Instead of solid observation work, we are being given some grand solution. I believe a lot of the money will be needed to support a large organization and its staff,” Sergey Barabanov, Director of the Observatory in Zvenigorod, Moscow region.
Astronomer Sergey Barabanov also claims that almost all the asteroids around the Earth have already been scouted by rival American and European systems.
He says that there is only a one in a hundred thousand chance that an asteroid which could threaten life on earth will head this direction in the next two centuries.
“There is a desire by the media to draw attention to any threat. There is a danger from asteroids, but we have been able to turn what were once probabilities into certainties. We do not need to panic,” Sergey Barabanov says.
IGMASS developers are now taking the project on the road, hoping to attract support from foreign governments and the United Nations. If they succeed, this will be one of the most ambitious scientific projects ever undertaken.
So as scientists say there is only a miniscule chance of a large asteroid hitting the Earth in the near future, it would appear that pumping billions of dollars into combating the problem is simply not worth it.
Whether or not the rest of humanity is willing to take that risk remains to be seen.
Boris Shustov from the Institute of Astronomy at the Russian Academy of Sciences urges everyone to calm down and not to worry, as the chances of an asteroid colliding with planet Earth are very low.
“The next event of a possible collision will occur in 2036 with the 300-meter Apophys asteroid, which is a rather dangerous body. However, the probability of [it colliding with the Earth] is estimated by the American astronomers at four chances per million. Other events that are more probable will occur in another dozen years – in 2047-2048,” Shustov told RT.
ISS docking: success on second attemptDuring its second attempt, the “Progress” supply ship has successfully docked at the ISS. The vehicle brought 2,6 tons of cargo to the ISS, including food, fuel, equipment, as well as presents for the crew. |
Medvedev examines innovative projects at youth education forumPresident Dmitry Medvedev has familiarized himself with youth innovative projects during his visit to the Seliger 2010 National Youth Education Forum on July 8. |
The Valery Menshikov’s IGMASS proposal is precisely of the type that should be seriously considered. Should we follow the recent example of the oil industry and Obama Administration who assured us that the possibility of something like the Gulf oil spill was quite remote? Was the Tunguska 1908 event rare? In taking down the manned space program Obama is also removing the primary means of planetary defense against Tunguska type events—i.e. large booster launch capabilities. Instead we should immediately launch programs like the deployment of miniature dispersed phased array infrared telescopes to Kuiper Belt utilizing the immediately available Orion-type method of propulsion to achieve relativistic velocities as has been studied at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory.












So let's bring back President Reagan's "Strategic Defense Initiative" or 'Star Wars' space based high powered laser. If near light speed travel can be accomplished just using solar wind and a "sail" as a means of propulsion then think of how useful the SDI could be to propel an Earth impact asteroid away from the planet or break it into pieces, (or mine it for the valuable metals it may contain.) The Tae Kwon Do masters have it right...."impossible becomes possible."