I was outraged when a criminal case was not opened! I am a mother of a 10yr old boy and 6yr old girl. My daughter was raped at age 3 in a preschool/kindergarden. Who knows what else that man could have done. I hope some children left that kindergarden!

July 02, 2010, 10:58, An Angry Mom Of Two wrote > I was outraged when a criminal case was not opened! I am a mother of a 10yr old boy and 6yr old girl. My daughter was raped at age 3 in a preschool/kindergarden. Who knows what else that man could have done. I hope some children left that kindergarden! How much would opening a criminal case do? Find out if he hurt one of the children there? While that's possible wouldn't that have surfaced by now and police would have very little ability to investigate unless more evidence of illegal activites surfaced. "Who knows what else that man could have done." you say well maybe he's philanthropist that have a little weird hobby or something, point being you don't know and I don't know but nothing really in the story said that he had any tendency to be a child molester or someting in that vein except that the photo in question was taken in a kindergarten building, If the building when the photo was taken was empty is there a differnce between a kindergarten and any other building? If it played out like that the only that man have done is being a bit off a exhibitoinist which in itself is hardly a crime. I don't know the circumstances surrounding it so I may be completly wrong but I don't want to judge a person before having atleast some off the facts and I'm wondering if you want to learn your children to judge persons before actually knowing anything about them.

agree with Just Because. What adults do in their own personal lives- if not harmful to anyonen else should not subject them to public or legal scrutiny, regardless what our opinions of that are. I'm sure there are millions of good parents out there who engage in 'adult' behavior in their own homes, whether that be their own sexual activities, pornography or any other completely legal behavior in their own homes- where their children spend FAR more time compared to a kindergarten. Should these people all be locked up or investigated as well? Young couples who do something like make love or take nude pictures in a park in the middle of the night when nobody is there? I'm sure children play in those parks during the day. And sure, in some cases they are breaking laws for tresspassing or indecent exposure technically, but we don't treat these people like potential child molesters and intrude on their lives by trying to make sure they can't get certain jobs again. We look at that as youthful indiscretion, or a couple "keeping the spark alive". You can see how we view this behavior by how it appears in media. Although...something does tell me, if it were a homosexual couple they would be treated the same way as in this article... The same behavior we all engage or have engaged in is considered 10x more 'deviant' when the couple is homosexual... I'm not disagreeing that this school was the WRONG place for these men to do such a thing, but the fact is they should only be held to whatever actual laws they broke. If there is no clear evidence to suggest that they have harmed or taken part in any of these acts with children or any other unconsenting person, they should not be investigated or pursued any further than that. Trust me, several people that interact with your children on a daily basis have active sex lives on their own time that probably involve things that you personally may find distasteful, or disagree with. You can't lock all of them up for that..

I agree with agreed, though I think the file was started on him due to the naked teen pictures. If he's ever up to illegal activities, it most likely would involve teenagers. Pedophilia is an encompassing term for a number of interests. Honestly, physically, 16 is about the time the body starts to mature quickly, so I can somewhat understand that. Sex with little kids is jail-worthy to me, and honestly I pity anyone who carries on a relationship with a teen. I'm 19, and I know that there are kids who are more "mature" than others their age, but at best a 17-year-old can only be as mature as a 20-year-old. Really, that's not saying much. Not much at all. If they were to raise the smoking age limit, I'd have to say that they should raise the sex age limit. If there are some states who believe one can thrust oneself into a myriad of disease from consumer products at 20, then one shouldn't be able to thrust oneself into a cesspool of disease by means of other individuals until the same age.

look "Just Beacause" in all honesty did you ever do ANYTHING proactive to safeguard your daughter from whoever violated her at her school? No probably not But ur soo quick to jump on the defense of the children, true they need to be protected, but at what costs to society? You didn't do a complete fbi backround investigation on every adult that was on the faculty and staff at her school or at least run their names through google did you? DID YOU? No u didnt. Had u maybe u would have found something maybe not. My point is we cant live in a society where it is ok to socially persecute someone who has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ILLEGAL!!!! NO LAWS WERE BROKEN!!! This poor man now has the great task of finding a job where no one knows of this and it will probaly not be wasy for him. But U could easily be blamed for your childs awful ordeal, that is if someone were to claim u didnt do some research on that particular schools staff, and the purposed violator had a criminal/sexual deviant behavioral past, hunh? My point is they didnt break the law, (teen pictures from online could easily be 18+ adults who knowingly and consenually agreed to the photos being taken.) I almost went to jail for having semi nude shots of my wife on my pc (had been deleted but pieces of that file remained on the harddrive) when it was being fixed at bestbuy. I had to prove my innocence "just beacuse" someone thought I had done something wrong. Im not mad at that tech that called the police, he was doing the right thing. What u wish would happen is horrible, wanting someone to go to trial/jail on a sex crime for upsetting u in ur beliefs and "the safety" of the children which actually had not been compromised, U lady are SICK AND DEMENTED, may u be subbited to such a harsh sentence when you are accused of a crime u never commited, so u can see how it feels!!!! All in all he ONLY did something that bothered you and the few dimwitted individuals like yourself.

Ace Boogie I think you did a mixup when writing your post. It seems you were refering to An Angry Mom Of Two post but mixed it up with my post and while I qouted An Angry Mom Of Two post that doesn't mean I support it which I think you would have noticed if you had read my whole post. Now concerning your post with that error aside I think you should be careful using so many assumptions since you can't really know what person have done or not unless you know the person in question in great detail. You bring up a good point concerning the teen pictures which I agree with, Teens age range is between 13-19 years so when "teen pictures" is mentioned it isn't really telling if it's illegal since all of those picture could be as Ace Boogie 18+ which isn't illegal, I also wonder if they can be sure that the persons in the pictures even are teens as it can be kinda hard to know if someone is 18 or 21 based on their body. I don't think that man deserved getting a file started on him when he couldn't be found guilty of a crime and with how part of how the public mass now treats him I think he got a much worse punishment then he deserved if he deserved any.