Russia to hold its grip for decade to come - forecast
Published: 22 September, 2010, 16:08
Edited: 25 September, 2010, 00:28
TAGS: EU, Russia, SciTech, Politics, India, China
Russia will remain one of the most influential world powers at least till 2025. The list of biggest world powers compiled by the US-based National Intelligence Council (NIC) placed the country at number 6.
The International Futures model proposed by the state watchdog acknowledges America of today as the world leader with more then 20% of the world influence. Following it are the EU, China, India, Japan, Russia and Brazil.
In 15 years things are likely to change a bit, the report says. The US will remain on top, even though it will drop its influence by 2%. Europe and China will trade places, with the rising Asian nation becoming world’s second-best power. India, Japan, Russia and Brazil will remain where they are despite some changes in their relative influence.
NIC calculations are based on the strength of economy, population, defence spending and other parameters.
Gypsy swing migrates to RussiaLeading jazz musicians from all over the world will gather at the first-ever International Festival of Gypsy Jazz in the Russian capital on September 22. |
Future Russian budget to fulfill social agendaIt seems that Russia's modernization plans will have to wait for a year or two. The state budget for the next three years will put them on the back burner to focus on social policy. |
@the scientist 1. Actually, Japan has one of the highest suicide rates in the world and that's been the case for the longest time. Depression in Japanese society due to a very boxed in existence, is pervasive and that leads to suicide. That's despite a very stable society. 2. On the other hand, Russia just recently emerged out of the devastating 90s. There is much to change and much to rebuild. Many achievements of the SU have been lost and the lost decade caused the country to be behind in some of the sci/tech areas. Drinking, male mortality, crime, youth, etc. problems stem from the 90s crisis. The Soviet Union posessed one of the most stable societies in the world. Children there were well cared for and educated, taught real values and felt safe. Crime, BTW was NON-EXISTENT. There was no problem traditionally, and this will be the case again when the country gets fully back on track. 3. Medvedev is absolutely correct in trying to diversify the country's economy and bring in companies/ specialists. If technology exists somewhere else, why reinvent the wheel? Meanwhile Russia can and will continue developing its traditional strengths. Japan has something Russia wants and Russia has something Japan wants (nat. resources) - they have a deal. Believe it or not, humans have been doing this for millenia, my friend. It's called trade and it's mutually beneficial.
Larissa, You wrote: "...Russia possesses energy/resources and that's the name of the game today, while Japan has none." It is quite obvious president Medvedev thinks otherwise, or why would he have invited (among others) Japanese hi-tech companies to come and populate Skolkovo? There's no future for any country as a leading power that continues to bank on natural resources alone, and Russia's statistics for crime, alcoholism, drup abuse and juvenile suicide rate (the highest in the world, btw) speak volumes. Much has to change in Russia - for the better, that is...












@Enrique I can read numbers and am aware that a 2% drop from 20% results in 18%. But you are splitting hairs. I actually said that US influence in my estimate will drop by 50-70% from today's number of 20% and, therefore, will be 8-10% or less in 10-20 years time. I don't know what US spending will be in 15 years and neither do you - no one does. All exisitng projections don't reflect the reality. You assume USA's linear growth and development based on today's and historic numbers. But it's not news any more that the US empire is collapsing, and will likely experience in the next 10-20 years what USSR/Russia went through in the nineties. Collapse is a non-linear event, in which most of the wealth and economic capacity will be wiped out in a short period of time. BTW, Japan, being a part of the Western world, will likely lose part of it's capcity as well, even if it doesn't go through a full collapse experience. Look at the new currency/trade war that's developing between China and Japan. My money is on China's win. Your math, therefore, doesn't work.