Pentagon could bomb enemy hackers
Published: 16 November, 2011, 18:26
A US Department of Defense report has outlined how the American military plans to respond to foreign hacker attacks.
TAGS: Conflict, Crime, Russia, Internet, China, USA, War
A US Department of Defense report has outlined how the American military plans to respond to foreign hacker attacks. We’re talking all-out retaliation, both in cyberspace, and in real life.
The 12-page document sent to Congress was made public on Tuesday. Legislators had wanted the Pentagon to deliver the report on new cyber-warfare policy by March 1 this year, but the top brass were a few months late.
"When warranted, we will respond to hostile attacks in cyberspace as we would to any other threat to our country," the report said as cited by Reuters. "We reserve the right to use all necessary means – diplomatic, informational, military and economic – to defend our nation, our allies, our partners and our interests."
The warrant for such an operation would come from the President, and he will decide what “use of force” in cyberspace will constitute. Stand-alone operations would not trigger a Congressional notification requirement under the War Powers Resolution, reports the Washington Post.
The biggest problem with reacting to a hacker attack is identifying the guilty. A number of security experts and intelligence have pointed to Chinese and Russians as the key perpetrators of cyber-attacks on American computers. However no accusations have been officially pressed against those governments.
The Pentagon plans to tackle the issue by employing behavior and cyber forensics experts, who would point to the individuals responsible.
The report also points out the need for an automated response to internet hostilities, which raised the alarm with some cyber security experts.
“The question is, how, and to what extent, are they thinking about automated responses?” Herbert Lin, a cyber expert at the US National Academy of Sciences, told the Washington Post. Such responses, he said, “are fraught with danger. Without people in the loop, you’re much more likely to do unintended stuff.”
One can only wonder what US officials would say if, say, Iran authorized its Revolutionary Guard to strike in retaliation to a Stuxnet worm cyber-attack. The virus crippled Iranian uranium enrichment facilities last year and is believed to have been created by highly skilled hackers. Some reports pointed to Israel and the US as being behind the malware.
16.11.2011, 18:06
26 comments
US base in Australia: China on noticeUp to 2,500 US marines will be permanently stationed in Australia within the next six years under a new agreement between the two countries. The move comes as Pacific region’s major player, China, is rapidly boosting its military might. |
16.11.2011, 19:52
9 comments
Down but not out: OWS reclaims Zuccotti (VIDEO)Occupy Wall Street (OWS) protestors were back in New York City’s Zuccotti Park Tuesday evening after police evicted them in a pre-dawn raid the very same day. RT was on the scene to film events as they unfolded. Occupy Wall Street |
What most of the commenters overlook is the U.S.' ability to turn this capability on their own citizens -- witness the tactics used on the peaceful Occupy movement across the country. We have home-grown activists who make social statements via hacking (Visa/Mastercard/Sony Playstations, etc.) Have to assume the Pentagon is on this too -- and Obama has "no oversight" -- he just decides who dies and presses the button? Terrific.
MikeNZ wrote in#10
Bomb hackers?
It would be some innocent. Real hackers don't get caught.
knowing that this is america that we;re dealing with, they;ll probably claim that there was a hacker located in downtown Beijing, or Moscow, and then bomb the whole neighbourhood to target that one hacker







Assuming the Pentagon hacks could actually do this, bear in mind then it will be software based. Think about it............for a couple of seconds......
didnt take long did it?
O dear, FAIL Again!
Just stop being so corrupt, then your not a target. Simples!
Does this really need pointing out?!!!