Russia – NATO talk Afghanistan, security
Published: 16 December, 2009, 15:06
Edited: 28 February, 2010, 04:18
TAGS: Meeting, NATO, Russia, Politics
President Medvedev will entrust the government with looking into the NATO chief’s proposals on expanding Russia’s cooperation in Afghanistan, the Russian Foreign Minister said.
"The president promised that he would order the consideration of the practical proposals that the Secretary General made to the Russian Federation. We also expect our ideas to be considered by the alliance," Lavrov said following a meeting between Dmitry Medvedev and Anders Fogh Rasmussen.
The NATO Secretary General is in Moscow for an official visit to discuss Russian help for NATO's war in Afghanistan, European security and some other issues.
At the meeting with Rasmussen, Medvedev acknowledged that Russia and NATO areadding a new dimension to their relations.
"Today, after a series of meetings and decisions that have been made, our relations are entering a new level. This has been aided by your statement, made after your appointment to the post of NATO Secretary General, as well as our joint work," the Russian leader said.
In turn, Rasmussen said that NATO is not a threat to Russia but rather a partner to deal with common threats. He pointed at terrorism as one of such threats and expressed his condolences over the Nevsky Express terror blast.
He also confirmed that the situation in Afghanistan can turn into a real problem in terms of drug trafficking and terrorism and it can affect Russia as well.
Anders Fogh Rasmussen said that one of his top priorities is to reinforce relations with Russia and to make the countries’ contacts more productive.
Earlier in the day, Anders Rasmussen met the Russian foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.
During his meeting with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Russian Foreign Minister said that Moscow is not inclined to dwell on differences with the alliance.
Sergey Lavrov also expressed his satisfaction over NATO’s and Russia’s mutual interest in normalizing relations.
“We appreciate your personal input into Russia-NATO Council talks on December 4. We have approved important agreements,” the Russian Foreign Minister said.
Rasmussen pointed that, although there are differences between the alliance and Russia, they should not overshadow their shared interests.
The NATO chief has also indicated that the past autumn marked a new period in relations between Russia and NATO. He added that the sides’ goal now is to develop practical cooperation.
Russian expectations
Russian authorities expect Anders Fogh Rasmussen to elaborate on the alliance’s official stance on the Russian-proposed European security treaty.
That is according to Russia’s envoy to NATO Dmitry Rogozin.
"As far as our interests are concerned, these are absolutely concrete issues. First of all, we would like to hear NATO's official position on a European security treaty,” Rogozin told Russian newspaper Izvestia.
“We need to understand whether or not we will be able to reach an agreement on its basic principles," he added.
Dmitry Rogozin said that the Afghan issue will also be on the agenda of the Rasmussen’s Moscow meetings.
"We want NATO officials to tell us about their plans and their vision of the situation in the region," he said. Rogozin pointed out that Russia wants its relations with the alliance to become more predictable.
After his meeting with Sergey Lavrov, Rasmussen is expected to hold talks with President Dmitry Medvedev, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, and other top officials.
Car bomb rocks Russia’s SouthA car with people inside has been blown up in the capital of Russia’s Republic of Ingushetia, Nazran, Wednesday. |
16.12.2009, 16:38
1 comment
Freedom of thought: Russian human rights watch gets Sakharov PrizeThe Russian human rights defense organization Memorial and its three leaders have received the European Parliament’s 2009 Sakharov Prize for freedom of thought, named after the late physicist-turned-dissident. |
In regards to Russia's assistance, thus far it has been small. The bases are nice. The use of Russian transit ways (which save NATO hundreds of millions of dollars) are nice. The small contributions of supplies are nice. But in relation to what is by NATO probably a $200+ billion per annum commitment, in lieu of the fact that alternative bases exist, Russia's contribution has been small. Russia's main interests in the conflict are that it wants to curtail the exportation of opium into Central Asia and Russia and that it wants to prevent the instability and violence in Afghanistan from spreading north to Russia's Central Asian allies. At present, NATO is primarily interested in strengthening Afghanistan's government and defeating the insurgency. To this end, NATO believes bombing the poppy crops would be harmful because it would be unpopular with the country's farmers. Even if NATO salvages the situation to the extent possible, there is no guarantee this would entail Afghan farmers giving up poppy crops.
Bianca, There is nothing in Afghanistan worthy of NATO resources except for the terrorists and to a lesser extent (although to a great extent for Russia) the opium. So it isn't so much that NATO wants things from Afghanistan as it is things that it wants to get rid of certain things in Afghanistan. NATO's commitment to Afghanistan is very expensive (w/ Obama's surge the US alone will spend $160+ billion per annum on the war), and so the limited interests it has in the area would not adequately compensate for a perpetual stay. NATO will inevitably leave the country, either being successful or beaten. However, the problem with time tables is that the war is unpredictable and NATO hasn't yet gotten to the point where it has decided it will leave soon if things don't get better. Time tables can be made, and indeed Obama proposed one, but we can't have confidence in these time tables yet because the war isn't being won and NATO hasn't yet decided on a threshold point beyond which it will forfeit the war. Nevertheless, make no mistake, NATO doesn't plan to stay forever.












I shall suggest to William to study the quantity of natural ressources laying in the ground of former Soviet-Unions republics located in the South of Russia and to guess which is the shortest and easiest way to get them to an arbor of great accessibility: Karchi, Gwadar ou Jiwani (near Iran). The whole process for US-NATO consortium is to grab all those ressources and be ready to do the same in Russia. We must also, not forget all the irakian and iranian ressources which both united consist of the largest oil and gas reserves of the World. To succeed in such a shame imperialist America accept the option to corrupt as many russian deciders as possible, even share some benefits, and slowly but surely suck their whole country in that insane, inhuman, asservissement system, called: "capitalism". They have used that strategy everywhere else; why should they change. Sorry Future Generations ! HAPPY NEW YEAR ! Jean-Claude Meslin