VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   News   Russian missile chief: ‘We can nuke your AMD’  
MORE ON THE STORY
RIA Novosti / Mikhail Fomichev 16.12.2011, 14:09 24 comments

‘US compels Russia to retaliate’

The US Congress decision which forbids the presidential administration from passing over to Russia any data concerning the AMD system without the consent of the Congress will force Moscow to resort to reciprocal measures, says Russia’s envoy to NATO.

Russia-NATO relations
US special assistant to the President for National Security Michael McFaul (AFP Photo / Vyacheslav Oseledko) 14.12.2011, 21:18 1 comment

Missile-shield pledge backfires for proposed US ambassador to Russia

Russia may be left without a US ambassador in the New Year, as the Senate has once again failed to approve Michael McFaul's appointment.

Polish air defence unit launches a ground-to-air missile near the Baltic coast city of Ustka May 28 during joint military exercises with other membeers of the NATO military alliance from Germany, France and the Czech Republic ( Reuters / Leszek Wdowinski) 09.12.2011, 19:33 5 comments

NATO plan to deploy ABMs in Europe ‘just a waste of money’

NATO’s plan to deploy its European missile defense system is “just a waste of money” as the allegedly dangerous countries lack the capacity to strike the US, while Russia would easily bypass the system, US physicist Lawrence M. Krauss told RT.

Russia-NATO relations

Russian missile chief: ‘We can nuke your AMD’

Published: 16 December, 2011, 15:00

Topol missile system at a testing range in Russia’s Novosibirsk Region (RIA Novosti / Aleksandr Kryazhev)

Topol missile system at a testing range in Russia’s Novosibirsk Region (RIA Novosti / Aleksandr Kryazhev)

TAGS: Arms, Military, Nuclear, Russia, Politics


Russian strategic missiles may target American anti-ballistic missile shield facilities in Europe, the commander of the Russian missile troops has warned.

­The missiles on duty have blank flight programs, but they can be promptly targeted at any destination, including the controversial European AMD sites, Lieutenant General Sergey Karakaev told journalists on Friday.

“There are no technical limitations on the use of strategic missiles. It would take very little time to select a new target and upload a new missile flight program,” he assured.

He added that “the combat use of missile troop forces is done on command of the Supreme Commander of the Russian Armed Forces, while planning objectives for possible strikes is the job of the General Staff.”

The general also announced the military’s plans to create a new heavy silo-based liquid propellant strategic missile. It will “have improved capabilities to overcome multiple echelons of an anti-missile system” through the use of advanced design of the vehicle and its warhead as well as better fuel.

Karakaev stressed that the need for the new missile comes due to development of ABM technology by the United States.

“If the USA deploys space-based strike anti-ballistic missile forces, which is not excluded due to intensive research in that area it carries out, the potential of small solid propellant missiles would not be enough to overcome such a system,” he said. “In this situation deployment of a liquid propellant ICBM with a launch weigh about 100 tonnes is preferable, since it would be noticeably better than a solid propellant missile of a similar size in terms of the payload-to-weight ratio.”

He added that such a missile can be used to deliver conventional precision warheads and will still have a virtually global reach, which gives more options for Russia in warfare.

In the short-term period, the existing Topol-M and Yars ICBMs are capable of overcoming any challenges the strategic missile troops may face, the commander assured. He said that by year’s end, a quarter of the missiles deployed by Russia will be of these advanced designs. The near-total rearmament of the military is currently being carried out and will be finished by 2012.

The American plans to deploy its anti-missile sites in Europe are a long-standing point of conflict between Moscow and Washington. Russia wants legal guarantees that the system will not undermine its nuclear deterrence, which the US is reluctant to provide such assurances.

Lately Moscow has taken a tougher stance on the issue, opting for a military response to the threat, which politics is failing to address. It plans to deploy Iskander tactical missiles in Kaliningrad exclave, which would allow destruction of the future ABM facilities, should this be needed. President Medvedev also ordered defense ministry to develop further measures to counter the American system.

+1 (1 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
Supporters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's sign a large Russian flag during a rally at al-Sabaa Bahrat square in Damascus (Reuters / Khaled al-Hariri) 16.12.2011, 11:33 27 comments

Russia puts new draft resolution on Syria to UNSC

Russia, surprisingly to Western powers, has put forward a UNSC resolution on Syria, calling on the Syrian parties to end violence and start talks. Meanwhile, Syria's vice-president is visiting Moscow to discuss peaceful solutions for the crisis.

Arab world protests
Egyptian soldiers beat-up protesters near Cairo's Tahrir Square on December 16, 2011 (AFP Photo / Mohammed Abed) 16.12.2011, 15:43 2 comments

Wet and stoned: Egyptian protesters cop it from military police (VIDEO, PHOTOS)

There are reports of clashes between police and protesters in Egypt at a sit-in protest demanding an end to military rule. It was sparked by a rumor that one of the activists had been detained and allegedly beaten.

Egypt unrest
fine2opine December 22, 2011, 00:28
0

Sheri wrote in #19

fine2opine wrote in #7

Sheri, your point, "do not let the US pull you into a spending race: Make them spend, instead, until they are unable to cover their military spending".  This is EXACTLY what the US did in the USA v. USSR arms race.  I agree with you, but not the comment to 'strike swiftly'.  I live here, thank you very much.

fine2opine,

"strike swiftly and forcefully" does not mean striking the US in its homeland; but rooting it out militarily from the East and West Asia, as a starting point. Because, it seems that even when the US is no longer able to support its military establishment across the world, it will do its best to destabilize it with the existing military tools at its disposal before it pulls itself out: Russia (and China)'s intervention becomes crucial at this point: They need to prevent the US from bringing death and destruction by crippling their ability once and for all to project military power well beyond its borders. I am quite happy with an America who sits at home peacefully. As long as we do not see its troops, drones and other overt-covert atrocities in our and our neighbors' lands, most of us are OK with a properous, constructive, and peaceful US. The point is: The crazy lunatics in the government and military will not easily recede; their heads (or hands, at the least) will have to be cut off through military action (surgical operations, so to speak) against US bases and other establishment across the world. This latest drone incident is a good example of a blodless surgical operation that cripples enemy's capabilities. We need more of this kind of operations. With China, Russia and Iran rising technologically and financially, we will witness, I presume, similar incidents more often.

 

Hi Sheri,

I cede you the point. Thanks for clarifying. I do agree with you in toto. 


Chuckchuckbobuck December 21, 2011, 20:26
0

Let Russia target AMD if they want to. It means nothing because Russia has no intention of actually attacking them. AMD was never intended to stop a russian ICBM attack. Such a system with that capability is simply too expensive. I dont think the Russian leadership is stupid enough to take on US on behallf of Iran, especially if Iran launched a missle at US or allies. Russia could have started WWIII a long time ago if they wanted to but they didn't and they wont. Hollow threats.

Daniel J. Lavigne December 19, 2011, 07:28
+1

The only way that offers some hope that humanity might survive the early years of the nuclear era is for individuals to develop spine and integrity sufficient to act on their LAWFUL duty to refuse to support societies that would be party to the use of nuclear and other weapons of mass murder.
The result of such a 'Tax Refusal' spread worldwide, are simple to visualize: 
Humanity, by such actions, brings about an unavoidable 'Dismantle or Use' scenario. As in dismantle all nuclear and other weapons of mass murder . . . or suffer their use.
'Sanity' would argue that a decision in such event would tend to support the possibility of total Dismantling. 
But the 'sanity' that has led us to murder each other, since the first human killing of another human being . . . is not likely to promote such an advance.
Ergo: We are doomed. 
Due our infection by the madness of greed and the stupidity that doesn't permit us to recognize that such an illness MUST be confronted . . . we shall suffer the ALL-OUT USE of all nuclear and other weapons of mass murder as 'Peak Oil' causes such as America to threaten all others in order to gain absolute access to and control of ALL of their resources.
Ergo #2: Since we are, due that madness, doomed to suffer the use of all such weapons . . . why pay taxes in the first place?
BTW: I predicted such to Canada's Prime Minister Jean Chretien on July 9, 2002 suggesting that we had 'ten short years' left before facing the collapse of ALL oil-dependent economies. You can find that message on the web-site included below.
Daniel J. Lavigne, FounderInternational Humanity Househttp://www.TaxRefusal.com