‘If NATO loses in Libya, the consequences will be enormous’ - lawyer
Published: 07 July, 2011, 22:10
Edited: 08 July, 2011, 14:17
Benghazi: The shadows of a Lybian man with his two daughters is cast on a painted wall as they look at drawings in Revolution Square on June 10, 2011 (AFP Photo/Gianluigi Guercia)
(27.7Mb) embed videoTAGS: Conflict, Military, NATO, EU, Politics, Bill Dod, Libya, War
NATO has denied a top Libyan official’s claims that they are intentionally using their airstrikes to assist rebel advances. Meanwhile, international lawyer Franklin Lamb claims that if NATO loses in Libya, it will face enormous financial consequences.
Libyan Deputy Foreign Minister Khaled Kaim told the Associated Press on Thursday that NATO has intensified bombing during the last days is the "final phase" of NATO's air campaign.
“The aim of these attacks is to help the rebels to advance,” he claimed, adding that it will be civilians who will pay the price. “But I assure you, it will be another failure for them.”
Meanwhile, Franklin Lamb, from the Americans Concerned for Middle East Peace organization, says NATO will pay a price as well – in financial losses.
“If NATO loses, the consequences are enormous,” he said. “There are enormous – trillion dollar – financial consequences for those NATO member countries that are seen as aggressors and invaders here.”
But Lamb suggested that NATO will not launch a ground operation because of the potential for civilian casualties and because of negative international opinion.
“The only thing they can do to possibly achieve victory is assassinate Gaddafi – and to do that, they might have to come in on the ground,” he argued. “I do not think this is going to happen. I think it would be a disaster. They cannot take the casualties and world opinion that would result from an invasion.”
A spokesman for the NATO military operation in Libya, Wing Commander Mike Bracken, insisted the alliance is not involved in ground battles. NATO is tracking the fighting between rebels and Gaddafi forces, though the main aim is protection of civilians, Bracken stressed.
NATO said Saturday it has begun ramping up its airstrikes on military targets in western Libya, where rebels are advancing through territory still largely controlled by Gaddafi's forces.
On Wednesday, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen reported that the alliance had targeted more than 2,700 military targets in Libya since its campaign there began.
"The momentum is against Gaddafi, his economic strength to sustain war is declining, his generals and ministers are deserting, the international community has turned against him," he claimed. "For Gaddafi, the game is over."
Meanwhile, a delegation of Libyan tribal representatives arrived in Egypt's capital on Thursday to negotiate with rebel leaders.
The people in Libya, meanwhile, are preparing for a possible ground invasion, Lamb said.
“Over a million have been armed. I have seen women, some older than 60 and one woman, 70, training. I think we are going to see a popular militia, a popular army emerge from the neighborhood if there is an invasion,” Lamb stated.
Andrew Gavin Marshall from the Center for Research on Globalization says that a ground invasion is quite likely, and that the process is already underway.
“There have been certain Western ground forces in Libya since before the NATO bombardment,” he said. “In early March the CIA, MI6 from Britain, special forces from both the UK and US were on the ground. And in April, France, Italy and the US agreed to send military advisers into Libya. And this drew a lot of parallels to Vietnam. First military advisers were sent, later the troops followed.”
He added that according to some reports, “a full-scale ground invasion [by the West] is being discussed. It may even be launched within the next few weeks. Other military sources in the US said they are preparing for the ground invasion by October.”
07.07.2011, 20:26
2 comments
Bestselling UK tabloid closes over phone hacking scandalNews International, a British newspaper publisher owned by media mogul Rupert Murdoch, announced the closure of the News of the World tabloid, which has been mired in a widening telephone hacking scandal. |
08.07.2011, 08:17
3 comments
Egypt’s “Twitter revolution” reloadedHundreds of thousands of angry protestors have gathered in Cairo's Tahrir Square, unhappy that the revolution's goals are not being achieved. Egyptian activists have been calling for a million people to gather there. Arab world protests |
Please do not complain at the RT because who is going to provide money for the government of Libya to rebuild his country.
How NATO is going to pay the price of the human life Libya?
Rebuilding the Libya is more expensive what NATO complains about losing
their money.
Losing money can make up it.
What about losing human life of the Libya, how NATO is going to make up the people life of the Libya.
I want answers from the leadership of U.K.U.S, France, and Germany and Italy and other NATO member states.
Otherwise, I am willing to give up my life to ask for the price of the people life of the Libya.
When I ask the price of people life of Libya, there will be a lot of blood that U.S. and NATO member states have to pay coming in the future.
Blood has to pay with blood. There is not another way around.
Unless, the survival family members of Libya people accepts the price given from U.S., U.K, France, Germany and Italy and other NATO member states. It will be fine with me.
RT has publish this answer.
We would have expected this line of questioning and rude interruption from CNN or BBC reporters. RT reports, I do hope would stick asking objective questions. NATO is bomb bring terror not peace. So why interrupt rudely those who have been to Libya? This reporter should be working for the News of the World where shock value of pain and suffering of victims became to the News.






Yes --you will not be able to slobber and wring your greedy hands looking for rest of Africa again because you did not take the queen in the chess game of your war