icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
29 Jul, 2013 15:45

Israel, Palestine back to negotiating table after 3yr stalemate

Israel, Palestine back to negotiating table after 3yr stalemate

Israeli and Palestinian teams have arrived in Washington to resume the Middle-East peace process after nearly three years of deadlock. Though optimism is in short supply ahead of the talks, with none of the sides eager to back down on its demands.

The two delegations began their meeting at the Iftar dinner breaking the Ramadan fast to be served on Monday evening at the Washington home of US Secretary of State John Kerry, who brokered the talks.

The meal was thought to be relatively informal and intended primarily to establish a friendly atmosphere between the Israeli and Palestinian negotiators.

Prior to the meeting, Kerry named former US ambassador to Israel, Martin Indyk, as Washington's envoy overseeing the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. 

He knows what has worked, and he knows what hasn’t worked,” Kerry said in the Monday announcement. “And he knows how important this is to get this right.”

Indyk previously served as ambassador to Israel under US President Bill Clinton and, as Kerry told reporters, understands the “art” of negotiating in the region. He is currently a fellow at the Brookings Institution think tank. 

Going forward, it is no secret that this is a difficult process – if it was easy it would have happened a long time ago,” he continued. “It’s no secret therefore that many difficult choices therefore lie ahead for the negotiators, and for the leaders, and as we seek reasonable compromises on tough, complicated, emotional and symbolic issues.” 

Indyk told reporters that the goal of the meetings is to have “two states, living side by side, in peace and security” - a task he deemed a “daunting and humbling challenge.” 

The US State Department said the aim of the current talks is to try to come up a work plan for the broader negotiations.

"The meetings in Washington will mark the beginning of these talks," Kerry spokeswoman Jen Psaki said. "They will serve as an opportunity to develop a procedural work plan for how the parties can proceed with the negotiations in the coming months."

Israel is represented by chief negotiator Tzipi Livni and veteran Netanyahu adviser, Yitzhak Molcho, at the negotiations, with the Palestinian team consisting of chief negotiator Saeb Erekat and Abbas aide Mohammed Shtayyeh.

The Israeli and Palestinian teams will meet with Kerry again in the State Department building on Tuesday. The joint press statement will be read out by the Secretary of State afterwards that will officially declare the start of negotiations. 

US Secretary of State John Kerry meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, on June 27, 2013. (AFP Photo / Jacquelyn Martin)

The actual talks are to be held later in the region. They’re expected to last from six to nine months.

Before her departure for Washington, Livni told Haaretz newspaper that she approached the talks “cautiously, but also with hope.”

Palestinian spokeswoman Hanan Ashrawi noted that the current talks are being held under more difficult conditions than previous negotiations.

She cited the Palestinian political split between moderate President Mahmoud Abbas and the Islamic militant Hamas, as well as the more hawkish positions of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in comparison with his predecessor.

“But I think there is a recognition of the urgency,”
Ashrawi said. “If we don't move fast and decisively, things could fall apart.”

A major faction of the Palestine Liberation Organization has rejected the peace talks just hours before the Israeli and Palestinian delegations’ meeting in Washington, AFP reports.   

The leftist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine said that the resumption of negotiations was “an individual move” by president Abbas, which did not have the backing of the PLO as a whole.

One of the party's leaders, Khaleda Jarar, spoke out against the American involvement in the talks, saying that “we went to the UN precisely to take our case out of US hands."

The resumption of talks between Israel and Palestine comes after half-a-year of shuttle diplomacy by Kerry. The announcement that Israel and Palestine had laid groundwork for the revival of the peace dialogue was made by the Secretary Of State on July 19 in Amman, Jordan.

Palestinian territorial demands

The peace process in the region was stalled for nearly three years as Abbas saw no point in talking to Netanyahu, fearing the hard-line Israeli leader would reject what the Palestinians consider “minimal territorial demands.”

The Palestinians want the borders of their future state approximating the boundaries of the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem – the territories, which were captured by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war.

But they have accepted the principle of limited land swaps to allow the Israelis to annex some of the dozens of settlements it has built on war-won lands.

Abbas had repeatedly stated that he will begin negotiations only if Israel either freezes settlement building or recognizes the 1967 lines as a starting point for drawing the border of a state of Palestine. 

Abbas seemed to undercut the hopeful tone just before the talks began, telling reporters that no Israeli settlers or border forces would be allowed to remain in Palestine under a truce agreement. 

In a final resolution, we would not see the presence of a single Israeli – civilian or soldier – on our lands,” he to a contingent of mostly Egyptian journalists on Monday. “An international, multinational presence like in Sinai, Lebanon and Syria – we are with that,” he went on, referring to United Nations peacekeeping missions.

Palestinian officials said on Monday that they received assurances from Washington that the US sees the 1967 lines as the basis for border talks.

However, a senior Abbas aide, who talked to AP on condition of anonymity, acknowledged that the Israeli side hasn’t signed on to that principle.

In recent days, senior Israeli officials have also repeated that settlement construction on the disputed land would continue. 

Israeli soldiers fire tear gas at Palestinian protesters during a weekly demonstration against the construction and expansion of settlements on village lands in the West Bank village of Nabi Saleh, near Ramallah (AFP Photo / Abbas Momani)

Israel considers all of Jerusalem as its capital – despite that status not being recognized internationally – and wants to keep its settlement blocs in the West Bank under any peace treaty.

Israel left Gaza in 2005 and that enclave is currently ruled by Hamas Islamists organization, which considers the Jewish state its prime enemy and opposes Abbas's peace strategy.

Resuming negotiations “is a dangerous step and the only beneficiary is the occupation [Israel], which uses it as a cover for its continued crimes,'' Hamas spokesman, Sami Abu Zuhri, said on Monday.

The Israeli government also denies the right of the Palestinian refugees from the 1948 War, which saw the Israeli state foundation, to return to their original homes, calling it a “demographic suicide.”

Netanyahu says any peace accord must safeguard Israel, being concerned that Hamas could gain new ground in the West Bank, with Kerry has described the security of the Jewish state as "paramount".

Meanwhile the Palestinians accuse Tel Aviv and Washington of discussing security without including them into the process.  

"This is a big shortcoming in the Israeli and the American behavior because they are not discussing their bilateral security, they are discussing a central and a fundamental issue of ours and it concerns our future as a whole," Yasser Abed Rabbo, a top official in Abbas's umbrella Palestine Liberation Organization, told Reuters.

Prisoners’ release

The Palestinian official said the expected prisoner release of the prisoners played a huge role in persuading Abbas to give negotiations another chance, even without Israel meeting his long-standing demands on the terms of such talks.

The Israeli cabinet’s decision to free 104 long-held Palestinian inmates, who had been behind bars since before the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993, has drawn some angry reactions in Israel. 

Palestinian protesters shout slogans in the northern West Bank village of Araba, near Jenin demanding the release Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails. (AFP Photo / Saif Dahlan)

Palestinians tend to view the prisoners as heroes, who sacrificed for the struggle for statehood, while many Israelis seem them as cold-blooded killers.

The list of prisoners eligible for release includes those, who murdered or wounded Israelis or killed Palestinian informers.

“The murderers will be released,” the front-page headline of Israel's Yediot Ahronot daily read on Monday.

Israel’s Economy Minister Naftali Bennett was among those opposed the prisoner releases. He warned against re-starting talks with the Palestinians, saying the two-state concept is “fundamentally wrong.”

Despite opposition in his cabinet, Netanyahu still pushed the Sunday's approval through with a comfortable 13-7 vote, with two abstentions. 

Netanyahu wrote an open letter to Israelis on Saturday, telling them that while it will be difficult to accept the freedom of former prisoners, “prime ministers from time to time make decisions that go against public opinion, when it is important for the country to do so.”  

This moment is not easy for me,” he told cabinet members over the weekend. “It is not easy for the ministers. It is not easy especially for the families, the bereaved families, whose heart I understand. But there are moments in which tough decisions must be made for the good of the country and this is one of those moments.”

“There’s a steep price to this decision, but not launching the diplomatic process carries a heavier price,” Netanyahu is cited as saying by Haaretz. "Launching the process will help Israel's strategic interests. A team under my leadership will approve the names of those to be released, and if the Palestinians commit provocations during the process, we will stop the releases immediately.”

Podcasts
0:00
27:33
0:00
28:1