'Iranian oil - not nukes - bothers the West'
Published: 26 February, 2012, 05:10
Edited: 26 February, 2012, 11:10
An engineer looks at the Phase 4 and Phase 5 gas refineries in Assalouyeh, 1,000 km (621 miles) south of Tehran (Reuters / Caren Firouz)
(40.2Mb) embed videoTAGS: Oil, Nuclear, Middle East, Politics, Iran, Kevin Owen, Resources, Israel, Gas
Iran insists it is only seeking a peaceful energy supply, while the West suspects Tehran is building an atomic bomb. And yet, some believe it is all about the oil. Again.
Conn Hallinan, a columnist at the Foreign Policy in Focus magazine, says the West's concern over Iran's nuclear program is merely a pretext to take control of its vast energy resources.
“I think the nuclear bomb is really in many ways a smokescreen. This is not about nuclear weapons,” he told RT. “If Iran were to use nuclear weapons, say against Israel, it would be an act of national suicide.”
Instead, the real concern for the West, Hallinan added, is Iran’s independent politics in the Middle East, as well as the eagerness among Western countries to control energy resources.
“The 1979 revolution in Iran essentially removed the second-largest oil resources and the third-largest natural gas resources from direct control by Western oil and gas companies and essentially made it independent,” he explained. “The West would love to get those resources back and they would love to also not have that kind of independent force in the Middle East. That’s also in the Israelis’ interest as well.”
In his recent article, Hallinan also wrote that Israel is interested in keeping the Middle East a fragmented place and, with that in mind, it is easy to see why Iran is not part of the general arrangement.
“They got it from their old colonial masters. You know, ‘divide and conquer’. That’s the way the British always did it,” Conn Hallinan said.
25.02, 23:44
25 comments
Russia questions credibility of Syrian Observatory for Human RightsThe activities of the controversial London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights have been denounced by Russia’s Foreign Ministry with spokesman Aleksandr Lukashevich casting doubts on SOHR’s reliability. Syria unrest |
26.02, 08:05
88 comments
Syria holds referendum amid bloodshedAn unprecedented referendum on a new draft constitution has taken place in Syria despite opposition calls for the population to boycott the vote. Once adopted, the new constitution will put an end to five decades of one-party rule. Syria unrest |
The truth is Iran and Syria sell unpasturized milk and the US wants to protect them. Americans are big humanitarians like the Jews.
This site needs a reply function for each comment. Far too much 'far-out', opinionated but unsubstantiated 'Blahg' that is essentially very difficult or impossible to contest or engage in dialog can just be posted here. Perhaps this separates 'blog' from commentary. Post your fantasy here, as in Zionist control of the west is encircling Russia and preparing to take it's resources, hello, it that were really happening, they would target your vodka. If Iran took over the Russian embassy and held it hostage until Russians voted (as though they did or even can now) in Iran's man (Reagan), how seriously would anyone take comments like oil (world market) or nuclear power plant contract competition. This site is financed by whom? Have a look. Negative response is a plus.







It's the US&Isreal that have forced Iran aquire nukes b'se in the first place Iran wanted another power source but only 2 discover the néed of nuclear weapons and what it mean't 2 the world and the actions they taken have actually forced them equip their forces 4 any possible attack forgetting that Iran ir capable of causing harm globallyonce attacked bse it also allies with ability who are tired of neo-colonialism. Up 2 now if Iran wanted 2 destroy Europeans it would but only continued supplying oil 2 them at this critical moment when temp is -30 Believe me let Iran bse IRAN is not Libya......or else you will regret and other 2 suffer