“Famine in Ukraine should not be presented as genocide”
Published: 27 April, 2010, 20:13
Edited: 29 April, 2010, 00:40
TAGS: Conflict, Russia, Ukraine, Politics
Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich claimed on Tuesday that the notorious famine during the 1930s in Ukraine was not genocide.
The country’s leader stated this during a PACE session. He said that Holodomor was “a consequence of Stalin’s totalitarian regime,” but cannot be called genocide against any particular nation, since mass famine was a tragedy for all countries in the Soviet Union.
On Wednesday PACE will review a report on the famine. The issue was brought up by Ukraine during the presidency of Viktor Yushchenko.
In 2006 Ukraine officially recognized famine as genocide. In 2010 Ukraine’s Security Department accused Joseph Stalin and other high-ranking Soviet officials of the crime. Russia is not accepting the Ukrainian version of historical events and insists that not only Ukrainians, but also people of other nationalities suffered from the starvation.
Yanukovich's statement is a positive step, says John Laughland from the Institute for Democracy and Cooperation in Paris.
“The attempt to present the Stalinist period – and particularly the famine of 1932-33 – as having been an act directed by Russians against Ukrainians is historical nonsense, and it’s dangerous nonsense,” he argued.
“Everybody knows that the Soviet regime was not led by a Russian but by a Georgian,” he continued. “And in any case, throughout the Soviet hierarchy and the membership of the Communist Party, there were people of all nationalities.”
“In the Soviet Socialist Republic of Ukraine, people administering the policies which led to the famine and to millions of extra deaths there would have been Ukrainians as much as many other nationalities,” Laughland added.
27.04.2010, 19:33
2 comments
Security Council approves resolution against piracyThe UN Security Council has unanimously adopted a resolution for strengthening measures against piracy near the Somali coast. The document was put forward by Russia. |
Victim’s family to sue Georgian TV for report about “Russian invasion”The family of a Georgian man who died after watching a falsified report about a Russian invasion on Imedi television has filed a demand to the Prosecutor General’s Office to launch an investigation into the case. |
On the contrary it is a sad day for Ukraine and for its people. Take into consideration every other genocide that recieves recognition and realize that the Ukranian people are heart broken and offended by this statement. Our current joke for a president is Russian and his words, actions and decisions WILL reflect Russian views and not of the true Ukranians. My great grandparents had lived through those times, educate youself a little, ask someone who knows and realize it did happen and John Laughland is a fool for thinking otherwise.A poor reporter if you ask me...
Thank you RT for your interview with John Laughland from the Institute for Democracy and Cooperation in Paris. He is thoughtful expert. I think today is great day for Ukraine, Russia, Europe and the world and it is sad day for Russophobes and those who want to keep Russia isolated.












Sofia, The Ukraine genocide discourse constructs a Russian conspiracy against the Ukrainian people but this is not supported by the historical facts. After the fall of the Soviet Union, Ukraine and other countries in Eastern Europe became hostage to neocon geopolitics and ordinary people can see their interests are not served by anti-Russia. But I agree with one expert that the current president of Ukraine must deliver jobs for ordinary people. Today, the only sad people are necons and Russophobes. Many of us who love Russia, Ukraine and European solidarity see this deal is good for Europe, for Ukraine and for Russia.