VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   News   “Only global AMD is acceptable” – Russia’s chief of staff  
MORE ON THE STORY
Russian President Vladimir Putin delivers a speech during a meeting with members of the Russian-German community in Munich, 11 October 2006 (AFP Photo / Denis Sinyakov) 05.02.2010, 19:06 13 comments

Munich 2010: lessons learned, lessons forgotten

Three years ago, former Russian President Vladimir Putin warned the world about the dangers of any nation – and the United States in this particular case– acting unilaterally on the global stage.

RIA Novosti / POOL 16.01.2010, 18:23 5 comments

“Signing new START treaty is based on the principle of parity” - Medvedev

Russian-US talks on replacing the expired Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty are progressing well, according to President Dmitry Medvedev.

28.04.2009, 07:35 1 comment

Scrap the nukes: Russia and US to discuss new treaty

Russia and the U.S. will hold talks in mid-May on the next stage of nuclear weapons reductions.

07.05.2009, 13:05

Lavrov goes on “reset” mission to US

Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov is in the US, where he is to meet President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton, and other US officials. His goal is to advance “resetting” relations between the two countries.

26.06.2009, 16:08 1 comment

The AMD and START issues cannot be separated

Yury Rogulev, director of the Franklin Roosevelt Foundation at Moscow State University, believes that the upcoming visit by Obama will prove difficult in coming up with solutions on both issues.

14.01.2010, 10:24

New arms treaty is practically ready

Russia and the US are going back to the negotiating table on nuclear issues, as Under Secretary of State William Burns visits Moscow.

06.02.2009, 17:39

Kissinger held secret talks in Russia

American statesman Henry Kissinger made a secret visit to Moscow to persuade the Kremlin to join a US proposal to slash the number of nuclear warheads on both sides, reports The Daily Telegraph.

20.05.2009, 14:51

“All countries watch Russia-US nuke talks”

The world is watching the US-Russia nuclear disarmament talks. If both sides act decisively, that could influence international security as well, says Yury Rogulyov from Moscow State University.

RIA Novosti / Pool / Michael Klimentyev 18.12.2009, 20:07

Russia and US make progress in strategic arms talks – presidents

Russia and the US have made excellent progress on the new strategic arms treaty and an agreement is near, the Russian and US presidents told the press after their Friday meeting in Copenhagen.

Sergey Lavrov (RIA Novosti) 16.03.2010, 21:28

Kiev may become the venue for new START signing

Relations between Russia and Ukraine are getting back on track, and Kiev could be the venue for the signing of the nuclear reduction treaty, the Russian and Ukrainian foreign ministers said after meeting in Moscow.

“Only global AMD is acceptable” – Russia’s chief of staff

Published: 21 September, 2009, 20:19
Edited: 22 September, 2009, 04:00

(13.4Mb) embed video

TAGS: Arms, Meeting, Russia


Russia will only agree to a shared missile shield with the US and will not accept the implementation of any new missile project by the US, Russia's Chief of General Staff Nikolay Makarov has stated.

The statement comes as Russian and US representatives hold consultations concerning the new strategic arms reduction agreement in Geneva.

He added that Moscow is negative about the US intention to deploy anti-missile defense elements in the Caucasus.

Russia believes there’s a need for a global defense system. The US, though, does not support the idea.

“For now they do not agree on a global AMD system. We haven’t had any consultations on the issue,” General Makarov told journalists.

He also hinted that Moscow has not yet taken the decision to give up its plans for the deployment of Iskander missiles in the Kaliningrad region because of the US shelving its anti-missile program in Eastern Europe. 

“A decision has not been made,”
Makarov said, speaking in Switzerland, where he's part of the delegation accompanying President Medvedev on his official visit.

Aleksandr Pikaev of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations said that the Russian military is taking its time to analyze the situation before making up its mind.

Watch interview with Aleksandr Pikaev

downloadembed
In November 2008, the Russian president announced that Iskander missiles will be deployed in the Kaliningrad region as a response to the possible deployment of an American anti-missile defense system near Russian borders.

Last Thursday US President Barack Obama announced Washington is reviewing its plans for the anti-missile shield because of a “reassessment” of the Iranian threat.

On Monday, Dmitry Medvedev once again stressed the need for a new security architecture in Europe.

At a joint news conference after a meeting with his Swiss counterpart, Hans-Rudolf Merz, the Russian leader said that the level of European security has dropped in the last 10 to 15 years.

“That is a sad fact,”
he said. “We are not divided into any ideological blocks. We don’t have different values, but at the same time the security level is sweepingly falling.”

Watch the joint media conference of Dmitry Medvedev and Hans-Rudolf Merz.

downloadembed



+17 (22 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
21.09.2009, 18:52

Afghan double-crosser enrages Russian tourists

A greedy Afghan driver has spoiled the journey of three Russians crisscrossing Central Asia, RIA Novosti news agency reports.

22.09.2009, 09:14

Foreigners trapped between Israel and Palestinian autonomy

Foreigners married to Palestinians have found themselves trapped under new Israeli regulations that force them to obtain Palestinian IDs, making it tougher to leave the region.

Mauricenakov September 21, 2009, 20:46
0

The US should move toward inclusion of Russia as a sign of good faith. Russia is no longer the Stalinist Soviet Union. Russia has surpassed the era of sorrow and oppression and is willing to be a global participant in a global community. In a global community, there are no real superpowers, but only countries that have more potential and ability to aid in the maintenance of global order. In a global community not one should be seen above the other and look down upon the other, but the see the other nation as a potential friend or ally, and seek means of exchange. The sole need of a singular superpower and superpower protection scheme has expired and is unnecessary. The world is to be multipolar and that alone. The Missile shield should involve Russia because the nearness to its sovereign borders, or does sovereignty doesn't mean anything to the US anymore? How would it feel if Iran put a missile shield near the borders of the US, would it like that action? No. It would say the same thing as Russia was saying. One must rationalize the missile defense as unnecessary and a violation of international sovereignty and the the right of the nation to protest and deny anything placed outside of its borders as a threat to national security. Did not the US deny the right for Cuban Soviet missiles to be stored on the island because it was a threat to national and global security, or was that a vain threat? It was true. It did create a sense of national security threat and did invade their national sovereignty. As the Soviet Union pulled out the weapons out of Cuba as a sign of understanding of the imposition into national security of the US, so to must the US remove the missile defense that is an imposition to national security of the Russian peoples. Since the US demands in turn respect for its national security and sovereignty, so to must it in turn give other nations respect for their national security and sovereignty.

Bianca September 21, 2009, 16:30
0

It is a very significant move in the right direction. Russia has stated what the world needs, a global security for everyone, not just for some. All countries and all people should feel secure. Gone should be the days that people are excluded from the security, and exposed to threats, just because a select group of counties finds their political system, their religion, their banks or enterprises, "unacceptable". Gone should be the days when some governments can make up stories about "bad" people and their "bad" behavior, when in fact, it is those countries --- acting in concert for their narrow interests --- that will tell any lie and twist any truth. And in process, demonize, humiliate and patronize. A day does not go by that we are not treated to lectures by the "superiors" on the inadequacies of the lesser countries and their leaders. A day does not go by, that those countries and their leaders are not lampooned, ridiculed and made feel less human. I am disappointed in the direction of US foreign policy. European, less so. Europe has a large colonial baggage, and even larger cultural and racial prejudice towards their fellow Europeans, Slavs. However, Europe has been growing and adjusting to its post-colonial future, while US has been steadily regressing into imperial mindset. US has simply taken over where the British left off. US history, from its founding, is based on the warnings against imperial temptations. In US, a handful of corporations that need US military to do their bidding, ridicule American people for "isolationism". From Clinton till today, Democrats or Republicans, they are chiding us for not embracing empire. But it will not work. The last election was a warning, not necessarily well understood. Empires do not make good leaders. But Russia needs allies who are willing to stand up, not just avert the gaze, when action is required. So far, BRIC has been more of a jelly wall.

Count Cash September 21, 2009, 10:00
0

We need move on here, well past what the US wants. We need to move to what the world wants, and that is a system for everyone, independent of US and NATO selfish interests. Moving on, means building the BRIC WALL. That means using BRIC to be the catalyst to build a world defence architecture that includes missile defence. Gone are the days when the illegal invader, rapist and torturer tries to Police. BRIC has the financial and technical muscle to face down the US and NATO and bring them under the rule of law. BRIC can be the catalyst with all other nations coming on board. We would then create a world defence architecture. Its simple mandate, act independently and independently with full force against 'anyone' acting outside the rule of international law e.g UN mandate or accepted international law. In parallel we need a proper world court, not the European political monstrousity trying to masqurade as one.Then the architecture could also bring violators to justice. One system for all nations, must be our goal. We need leave the US and NATO jungle!