Homegrown terror plots seen as FBI entrapment
Published: 28 October, 2010, 08:15
Edited: 28 October, 2010, 19:28
A war is being waged in the US against homegrown terrorism, but critics say some of the FBI’s tactics amount to entrapment, with agents helping to organize plots simply for a PR coup when the agency foils them.










As someone who attended the trial for 2 weeks, I can only say the FBI's role in creating this case cannot be overemphasized. The video evidence showed Hussain(the "informant") driving the defendants on the day of the bombing and directing every single move the men made. Cromitie returned to the minivan after placing one "bomb", reporting that he wasn't sure if he actually set the timer correctly. Hussain put his mind at ease by saying it was ok because it could be set off by remote control as well. This is just one example of the involvement of the FBI "informant". Further, not only was the whole plot a fiction created by the FBI, the government prosecutors relied on fiction as the foundation of their summation, wherein the prosecutors terrorized the jurors by tactics such as aiming an actual rocket launcher at the jury (something the defendants never did) and showing a fictionalized scenario of a car being blown up by the kind of bomb with which the defendants believed they were working (there were no explosions in the case at hand). Finally, most of the defendants only acted as look-outs, and as I said earlier, the other was unsure whether he set the bomb properly or not. Does this betray ambivalence on Cromitie's part?