European backlash over multiculturalism
Published: 14 February, 2011, 08:23
TAGS: Conflict, EU, UK, Europe, Human rights, Immigration, Irina Galushko, Tesa Arcilla
European leaders are one by one denouncing the policy of multiculturalism. The latest “fail” stamp came from French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who said he does not want people to pray in an “ostentatious way” in the street.
As popular unrest stirs up Northern Africa, there are fears of a fresh wave of immigrants flocking to the EU and the Old World is not waiting for them with open arms.
The concept of multiculturalism seems to be failing all around Europe.
The one who started the trend was German Chancellor Angela Merkel. “This approach has failed, utterly,” she said.
Then British Prime Minister David Cameron weighed in, saying, “We failed to provide a vision of society to which they feel they want to belong.”
And now France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy has made an admission, as well. “My answer is, clearly, yes, it's a failure.”
The heads of state have only now realized what many observers and radicals have been saying for quite some time.
“Multiculturalism will only function if people coming to the country will have a job, have their own money and feel responsible for the community,” says immigration officer Arnold Mengelkoch from Copenhagen. “Otherwise, they are jobless people who lead a passive life with social welfare.”
And the passive approach can sometimes evolve into extreme action.
Denmark is home to more than half a million immigrants, making up 10 per cent of the population.
Take Odense, a quiet Danish town, known as the birthplace of Hans Christian Andersen, one of the world’s best-known fairytale authors.
But the story unfolding here has nothing magical about it.
Clashes between Danes and groups of Somali and Palestinian youths have rattled this neighborhood for more than a year. Locals say car burnings and violence between immigrants and police are a familiar sight.
This Danish neighborhood tries to sustain a collision of two different worlds. And voices are being raised about doing something before the situation gets out of hand.
There have been some suggestions on how to ease the tensions.
“If we take those 200 people and split them all over the city with the help from the state and police, and kick them out of the country, we won’t have any problems,” says Odense City Council member Alex Ahrendtsen.
But some immigrants believe the main issue is in the definition of integration.
Gassan Khorani, a Danish immigrant and civil engineer, says immigrants and natives just perceive the idea of integration differently.
“The Danes think that integration means becoming fully Danish. Immigrants have to eat, drink and live just like the Danes. But those who come here think integration means earning some money, having their kids speak Danish and going to Danish schools. That’s why there’s a discord,” he says.
Perhaps until this difference in expectations is resolved, the cultural tensions in Europe will persist. But admitting that the problem exists may be the first step on the way to finding a solution.
Speaking about who to blame for this failure, Brian Cattell, from UK think-tank the Bow Group, says he thinks that “both sides” – the government and immigrant communities – are guilty.
He says there is always a risk that Western leaders' remarks slamming Muslims for failing to integrate could cause a backlash and further divide society, but “the risk of not doing anything is greater."
“The comments which were made by David Cameron and some other European leaders have predictably provoked some criticism from various groups, but I think the question you need to ask yourself is what the risk of not doing anything is – of leaving the status quo – and I think the reason these politician have come out so firmly with a view which, probably a couple of years ago, would have been considered a taboo…. I think the reason they have done that is that they think that the risk of not doing anything is greater, because we run the risk of the Europe in which people of the Muslim faith, perhaps some other groups feel separate, they do not feel happy, the part of that Europe. And that can lead to feelings of extremism and in very rare cases, but tragic cases, people are turning to terrorism,”Cattell says.
Member of the European Parliament and the EU parliament's vice-chair of foreign affairs, Fiorello Provera, says Italy faces the same multicultural problem because most of the immigrants do not want to live by the country’s rules. Multicultural tolerance, he says, means that all people have to live following the same rules and laws.
“Immigrants [in Italy] are tolerated if they follow rules, laws and traditions. It is very easy to tolerate, to accept immigrants following the rules. If they want to live their own rules on our territory, it will be very difficult to accept for the Italian people.”
Failure of multiculturalism is the fault of the European governments not standing up to reality, believes Danish writer and columnist Mikael Jalving.
“You can’t blame a whole group of people for not doing this or that, but you can blame the politicians for not dealing with the problems, not turning them into subjects that can be criticized and debated, which is exactly what they are trying to do now,” Jalving told RT.
Two Russian soloists awarded GrammysThe prestigious international Grammy awards, presented each year by the American Academy of Recording Arts, were won this year by soloists from the Mariinsky Theater in St. Petersburg. |
14.02.2011, 11:12
2 comments
Cop that! Girl’s murder plot undone in stingA case in which a 19-year-old student tried to execute the cold-blooded murder of her own family has shocked Russia's southern city of Volgograd. |
But any immigrants to a country must respect that country, its laws, way of life etc. If they don't they will not be tolerated. The problem is so many people come and live in countries simply for money and economics. How many actually want to learn about the country, understand the culture etc. I live near Birmingham UK. The English are utterly ignored both culturally and religiously in Birmingham - multiculturalism here is simply celebrating minorities. Has any of these minorities bothered learning about the local English? It seems most think it’s a right to just come to a country - I am sorry but there comes responsibilities. In most areas the English have simply moved out and on a daily basis minorities rarely see an English person. So in that sense it is minorities learning about minorities while the majority just sitting and watching them. In reality where I live most are living parallel lives - but there is no riots because nobody really speaks to anyone. Most let minorities celebrate their cultures and religions (no-one has a problem with this!) but they do get annoyed by the fact they are not valued and treated equally with minority cultures and religions and most are fed up hearing about every other culture.
Multiculturalism seems a good idea but the problem with it is it celebrates the minorities and not the majorities. When any cultural group of people feel threatened, they are bound to stand up and defend it. Large amounts of people cannot possible integrate into a host country. Anyway you cannot strip a group of people of their heritage or culture, that is their heritage or culture. I would like to know what integration is exactly? Does it mean people simply keep their culture, contribute to a society and live their own life, or does it mean stripping people of their identity to make them the same as the hosts? Stripping anyone of culture is simply wrong! And so is ethnic cleansing.









Perhaps one key to current european multicultural discord relates to western european welfare systems. Large scale immigration into states with historically developed welfare systems is causing problems. Actually this links back to some comments above concerning Yugoslavia, where large numbers of Albanian refugees where absorbed into Kosovo post 1945, by Tito for ethno political reasons. Those Albanian immigrants then utilised the Yugoslav redistributive welfare subsidies to remain a largely autonomous cultural group within host Serbian federal state. Likewise much the same is occuring today in western Europe, large migrant numbers can access welfare relatively quickly in welfare states like UK and Denmark. These benefits wont make you wealthy, but they do allow immigrants to remain economically and therefore culturally outside of broader host culture. As this welfare support delays or buffers the need of new arrivals to economically integrate, ie pick up language and cultural skills of host state, in order to cohesively operate in it.
Don't get me wrong, welfare was a good european historical and political development. However, it was instigated as a response to the Great Depression, to offer a safety net to a state's citizens when necessary and is a contributory system based on taxation. So its current extension in western Europe as a de facto support system for large scale immigration is a profound misuse, and unsustainable both economically and culturally.