Let’s try to make a better setting for this problem, because the residents of Khimki would not only fail here, but would also aggravate all further attempts to improve the environment. Therefore, as a mental lateralization, we look at the forest as being ourselves. The problem is to trace any project of common pragmatic benefit through our community. If we make a division line through community and declare that good guys are separated from bad guys, than all attempts of good guys actually create this division line and destroy the wholeness of their community (revolutionary pattern). Conclusion is – there would be double damage, one to the forest and another to the community loosing the valuable substance of positive alternative energy on account of confrontation waste. The group of good guys will now remain able to brew their views from within community without splitting it (evolutionary pattern). Environmental progress is only the one accomplished without political capitalization. In all other “solutions” - experience is showing – environment ends as the ultimate victim. The defense of Russia is also environmentally harmful, shall you now split Russia a half for sake of word’s better off? And then we’d wait to join good guys to integrate later on? What shall we do with the residual bad guys forced out to political periphery? Political environment is to respect. A creative mind – always subjugates! So does the planet. It calls for self denied responsibility, not for teaching. “Teachers leave the kids alone…” sing Pink Floyd.