Democracy is never achieved through occupation – Afghan activist
Published: 23 June, 2011, 08:59
TAGS: Interview, Afghanistan
RT has spoken to Malalai Joya, a former Afghan MP and human rights activist, who has been fiercely criticizing the current regime and the occupational force for "throwing Afghans from the frying pan into the fire".
She says her country is suffering from three evils at the moment: overwhelming corruption of the regime, indiscriminate violence of the occupational force and regional warlords whose actions differ little from those of the Taliban.
“These fundamentalist warlords are mentally the same as the Taliban. They were in power before the domination of the Taliban and in Kabul alone they killed more than 65,000 innocent people. They destroyed our national unity… They committed many crimes against our people similar to the Taliban. And with their bloody hands, but under a mask of democracy they came in power after 9/11, imposed on our people,” she said.
Joya says the US troops may enforce some positive change wherever they are in control, but in the provinces the situation is very bad. The major failure of the occupation strategy is that it does not help ordinary Afghans, rather it alienates them.
“I think people of the US and around the world agree with my people that democracy never comes by occupation. Democracy never comes by military invasion. Democracy never comes by cluster bombs, by white phosphorus, by massacre, by bombing out wedding parties,” she said.
The keys to change for Afghanistan are education for the people and real justice, the activist says.
“Education is the key regarding resistance of the Afghan people against occupation and against ignorance. And democracy without justice is meaningless,” Joya believes.
23.06.2011, 08:39
22 comments
“Rebels” are power-hungry terrorists, say Libyan refugeesCivilian casualties have raised serious misgivings about NATO intervention in Libya, even among supporters of the ongoing aerial campaign. And while the international community is taking sides in the conflict, it is the Libyan people who suffer most. Libyan conflict |
23.06.2011, 11:38
7 comments
Dutch politician acquitted of hate speech chargesRight-wing lawmaker Geert Wilders, who has been standing trial for inciting hatred and discrimination against Muslims, has been acquitted of all charges by a Dutch court. |
The US would really like to pull out and leave these people to their fledgling Democracy, but their is a venomous cult of murderers in the country that would kill you for watching a tv set. Thats why were still stuck there!
America is not interested in brining "democracy" to either Afghanistan or Iraq. America is only interested in control of those countries, and if a brutal dictator is willing to be America's puppet, so be it.
Nor, was American interested in bringing "democracy" to the Africans they enslaved, or the indians they slaughtered.
When the time is ripe for America to begin the destruction of Russia, the campaign will be carried out under a large banner proclaiming "We are bringing the Russians democracy and a better life".





Cannot control the countryside either.
The law of unintended consequences is always in the equation from the universe.
The unknown subtle genius of the human brain, all connected as one thus, in the Mind critical mass 51% and then, change. Not until.
Must all think real deeply here and now, Balance into the truth of power to restore wholeness into sanity as our center.
Do not and cannot control the mind in every cell of our human body/ies.