I am sure I know what they have excluded as well: most of the data from the Southern Hemisphere. It is not a secret, nor is it man-made, that the Northern Hemisphere has been getting more temperate --- and for a long, long time. The Precession of Equinox, the rotation of Earth's poles, is currently in the Northern Hemisphere during summer in APHELION, causing longer, cooler and dryer summer. In winter, it is in PERIHELION, that is, closer to the sun, causing temperate, shorter winters. Due to the lower rainfall, there is less ice to recover during winter. Just the opposite is in the Southern Hemisphere. The summers are shorter and warmer, while winters are longer and colder. The ice coverage has INCREASED, and significantly. I am sure that such data is hard to find. What is the oveall impact of temperature change? Who knows. These people have demolished my faith in scientists. But the media is much more to blame, as it gives no space to those questioning the preordained data. Climate on Earth is affected by other sun-reated factors as well. This is why I hope the media will have a good review of Milankovich climate cycles. NASA did not for nothing name a crater on the Moon after this scientist. From what I gather, while the Precession of poles is one factor, other cycles point to the long term cooling of the planet. The Earth's eccentricity, the eclipse around the sun, is very short. As it will inevitably lengthen over long, long time, Earth will become cooler and cooler. And there are so many short-term variations, like the cooling likely to start in 2012. So, if the data from the South Pole has been fully accounted for, we may on average experience no change whatsoever in the last 100 years. If they overstated the rise of the temperature in the Northern Hemisphere, and understated the fall of temperature in the Southern Hemisphere, the results are predictable. And the peer review! What a sham!

Honest world leaders {if there are any left} should work to expose the current climate fraud, perpetrated upon the citizens of the world. This is not a time for real leaders to play along and be politically correct. There is too much at stake. The people of the world have already been screwed too much by phoney economic bubbles and billionaire committed crimes that are not being prosecuted in the courts. For once, give the people fairness and honesty. Prosecute these false profits of doom and remove their credentials. Once this snowball starts rolling down the hill there will be no way to stop it. It could gather trillions of dollars {DERIVITIVES, ETC} before it is finally descovered to be a total fraud. Just like the recent bubble {THAT WAS NO ACCIDENT} when it has run it's course and robbed the people, the politicians {who are special interest owned} will put on another show and rip the people off even more to "FIX IT AND SAVE US ALL".

The climate scandal is being enhanced be the billionaire owned, corrupt news media. The medias are going along with this fraud because this is what their owners want. There is no freedom of the press in the world today. It is all prepackaged and spoon fed to a world population, that has been dumbed down to a point where they are no longer resistent to any old big lie or fraud. The money changers have taken control of the world {new world order}. Sorry people of the world. You are about to be screwed, big time, once again..

I enjoy Russia today as a news channel, however today I have just watched an interview with an American senator who doesnt believe in the global warming scenario. The interviewer behaved like a grinning sycophant, absolutely no tough questions where asked at all, this is not journalism, this is propaganda. It must be obvious to the most unintelligent person that pouring greenhouse gasses and filthy pollutants into our atmosphere is not good for the planet or us, a lot of Americans in public life who poo poo global warming have links to the petro chemical industry, dont forget, the emissions from Texas alone outstrips some countrys total output. Lets have a BALANCED argument please.

Stories like this from RT are refreshing. On the one hand the Met Office in the UK or its public interface seems over bloated and plagued by vanity, but on the other it does have big responsibilities which its diligent staff take seriously, maybe even zealously. We can see that people in this kind of organization are ideally placed to - at least try to - avert a war caused by oil running out before a suitable alternative is in place. Given that we should take everything with a pinch of salt anyway, the possibility of honourable intent and reduction of future suffering deserves to be recognised. The risk of over egging the cake is loss of credibility with the public. But over dependence on expensive computer modelling has similar risks with funding anyway. The question is, do these people use uncertaintainty as a life saver or just an excuse.