VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД RSS
breakingnews
Go to main page   News   Blogs   Juha Molari   Corruption investigations a front for color revolution push   Comments  
mostpopular
photo_of_the_day
bestvideos

Corruption investigations a front for color revolution push

Published: 07 February, 2012, 19:40
Edited: 11 May, 2012, 17:23

­Dollar-funded corruption probes by international organizations, foreign election observer missions may sound worthy, but in reality are often “color revolution” tools for creating political unrest. Now they are fostering anti-Russian sentiment. The politicization of organizations such as Freedom House (FH), the Open Society Institute, the Economist Intelligence Unit and Transparency...

Comments (8):

Marzipan6 (unregistered), February 08, 2012, 14:24 quote
+7
Juha, Sigmund Freud is reputed to have said that sometimes a cigarette is just a cigarette. Same with corruption indices -- sometimes they are just an index, based on verifiable analysis of objective data.

Russia is a cellar dweller in all -- repeat, ALL -- international corruption and associated surveys (see my post of January 26, 04:28 in your multiple-missnamed "Collapse of the West's Human Rights Paradise" blog article). Indeed, the unanimity of their reports reinforce their credibility. The alternative would be to assume that the entire world is engaged in a masterfully disguised and concerted anti-Russian conspiracy. Which would be taking paranoia and the cult of victimhood just a bit too far.
Juha Molari, February 08, 2012, 17:18 quote
-2
If Marzipan will read so-called dollar-funded "corruption investigations", you would see easily, that they don't base on any verifiable analysis or objective data, but they are just "political views". And it is open information, verifiable information, that these "corruption investigation organizations" are in close contact with each other, they don't find new information but they are just tools for creating political unrest.
Nobody states that Russia would be without any corruption, but results and analysis and solutions are quite different from these few international organizations.
Marzipan6 (unregistered), February 08, 2012, 22:51 quote
+2
So Russia is NOT corrupt?  Even Putin and Medvedev loudly proclaim otherwise. Perhaps they, along with apparently everyone else in the world, are also trying to stir up a "colour revolution" in Russia.
Horst, February 09, 2012, 16:35 quote
+2
What bothers Russians is that USA does not regard it anmore as a significant issue. In the latest US military doctrine the main focus was on Asia and Pacific area. About Russia there were only a couple of generic sentences. It feels bad to be forgotten by friends but even more when the "enemies" ignore you totally.
Russia has lost her international importance. Therefore Putin and his pets like Molari are drawing all kinds of conspiracy theories. They want to believe that Russia is still a significant player and that is why the West is playing dirty games. The truth is that only few care and Putin is shouting in the room alone with his criminal gang, but nobody cares to listen their raving.
Juha Molari, February 12, 2012, 21:57 quote
-1
We cannot speak about any kinds of conspiracy theories, if we refer to the report of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. It shows that American attack 2011-2012 against Russia and Russian elections are well prepared: "The US should insist on effective international monitoring of elections. ... The best monitors have proven to be nongovernmental organizations. ..The US can assist in setting up independent exit polls for elections. The most effective protests in the region have been those led by student activist organizations such as Otpor in Serbia, Kmara in Georgia, Subr in Belarus and Pora in the Ukraine. Their techniques are well-known and can and should be disseminated in Russia" (a report "Putin's Decline and America's Response"; 12 August 2005; soon after the Orange Revolution in Kiev; by Anders Aslund, then director for Russia and Foreign Programmes of the Carnegie Foundation; Carnegie Endowment for International Peace).
Horst, February 13, 2012, 00:55 quote
+2
Juha is referring to material from more than six years ago to legitimate protests of today. He is strong in his faith, and I am not talking about Christianity.
John (unregistered), February 13, 2012, 13:20 quote
+4
Juha, why do you have such a paranoiac phobia against the West, especially USA?
Marzipan6 (unregistered), February 14, 2012, 12:01 quote
+3
Juha purports to quote snippets of  "the report of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace," but fails to index the particular report that was the source of the quotes. Very conveniently, we are therefore unable to look at those quotes in context, and see if they honestly represent what Juha claims they do.

I will quote an extract from another report from the Carnegie Endowment, but unlike Juha, I will identify it precisely, so that anyone can look it up and read it in full themselves. It comes from their article entitled, " What the Russian Protests Can  -- And Can't -- Do," published this February 9.

"To be sure, there is nothing new in Russia about arrogant leadership or electoral fraud. Six years ago, for example, the Russian public was informed that voters would no longer elect their governors, including the Mayors of Moscow and St Petersburg. And two years ago, Moscow election officials rigged the elections to the city's Duma so scanadously that all opporition factions in the national legislature walked out in protest."

Read the rest yourself. Especially you, Juha.

Juha complains that "the American attack of 2011-2012 against Russia and Russia and Russian elections (America attack???) are well prepared." I would hope that everything America (and Russia) do is well well prepepared. Preparation is not a crime. Election fraud is. 
POST COMMENT

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our posting rules


CAPTCHA image