Part 4, Anything that breaks down the immune system causes Aids and that includes so-called recreational drugs. The vast majority of Aids deaths in the United States involve homosexuals and this perpetuates the myth that it has something to do with sex. But homosexuals in the US are among the biggest users of drugs which genuine doctors have linked to Aids. Prostitutes who take drugs often get Aids, prostitutes who do not take drugs invariably do not get Aids. The rise in the Aids figures in the United States corresponds perfectly with the increase in the use of drugs - most of which are made available to people on the streets by elements within the US Government, including Bill Clinton and George Bush. In Africa, the breakdown of the immune system, now known as Aids, is caused by ill health - lack of good food, clean water and the general effects of poverty. Haemophiliacs do not die from HIV-infected blood, they die, as they did before the Aids scam, from a quirk in their own immune system. Their immune system locks into foreign proteins in the infused blood and on rare occasions it can become confused during this process and attack itself. Their immune system, in effect, commits suicide. HIV is irrelevant to that. Yet how many people today who have been diagnosed HIV positive are having their lives blighted by the fear that the symptoms of Aids will start any moment? AZT is the killer. There is not a single case of AZT reversing the symptoms of Aids. How can it? It's causing them, for goodness sake. The Aids industry is now worth billions of pounds a year and makes an unimaginable fortune for the drug industry controlled by the Rockefellers and the rest of the Global Elite."

Part 3, It destroys the immune system, so CAUSING Aids. People are dying from the treatment, not the HIV. Aids is simply the breakdown of the immune system, for which there are endless causes, none of them passed on through sex. That's another con which has made a fortune for condom manufacturers and created enormous fear around the expression of our sexuality and the release and expansion of our creative force. What has happened since the Great Aids Con is that now anyone who dies from a diminished immune system is said to have died of the all encompassing term, Aids. It is even built into the diagnosis. If you are HIV positive and you die of tuberculosis, pneumonia, or 25 other unrelated diseases now connected by the con men to "Aids", you are diagnosed as dying of Aids. If you are not HIV positive and you die of one of those diseases you are diagnosed as dying of that disease, not Aids. This manipulates the figures every day to indicate that only HIV positives die of Aids. This is a lie. Many people who die from Aids are not HIV positive and the reason that the figures for Aids deaths have not soared as predicted is that the overwhelming majority of people diagnosed HIV positive have never developed Aids. Why? Because HIV has nothing whatsoever to do with Aids.

Part 2, Dr Wilner even injected himself with the HIV virus on a television chat show in Spain to support his claims. Other doctors and authors come to the same conclusions, among them Peter Duesberg PhD and John Yiamouyiannis PhD, in their book, 'Aids: The Good News Is That HIV Doesn't Cause It. The Bad News Is "Recreational Drugs" And Medical Treatments Like AZT Do'. That's a long title, but it sums up the situation. People are dying of Aids because of the treatments used to "treat" Aids! It works like this. Now it is accepted by the establishment and the people that HIV causes Aids, the system has built this myth into its whole diagnosis and "treatment". You go to the doctor and you are told your HIV test was positive(positive only for the HIV antibodies, by the way, they don't actually test for the virus itself). Because of the propaganda, many people already begin to die emotionally and mentally when they are told they are HIV positive. They have been conditioned to believe that death is inevitable. The fear of death leads them to accept, often demand, the hyped-up "treatments" which are supposed to stop Aids occurring. (They don't.) The most famous is AZT, produced by the Wellcome organisation, owned, wait for it, by the Rockefellers, one of the key manipulating families in the New World Order. AZT was developed as an anti-cancer drug to be used in chemotherapy, but it was found to be too toxic even for that! AZT's effect in the "treatment" of cancer was to kill cells - simple as that - not just to kill cancer cells , but to kill cells, cancerous and healthy. The question, and this is accepted even by the medical establishment, was: would AZT kill the cancer cells before it had killed so many healthy cells that it killed the body? This is the drug used to "treat" HIV. What is its effect?

Part 1, HIV does NOT cause AIDS! "AIDS: The Great Con Trick HIV does NOT cause Aids. HIV does not cause anything. A staggering statement given the hype and acceptance by the scientific establishment and, through them, the public that the HIV virus is the only cause of Aids. HIV is a weak virus and does not dismantle the immune system. Nor is Aids passed on sexually. There are two main types of virus. Using the airplane analogy, you could call one of these virus strains a "pilot" virus. It can change the nature of a cell and steer it into disease. This usually happens very quickly after the virus takes hold. Then there is the "passenger" virus which lives off the cell, goes along for the ride, but never affects the cell to the extent that it causes disease. HIV is a passenger virus! So how on earth did it become the big boogy man virus of the world? The person who announced that HIV caused Aids was an American, Doctor Robert Gallo. He has since been accused of professional misconduct, his test has been exposed as fraudulent, and two of his laboratory executives have been convicted of criminal offenses. Tens of millions of people are tested for HIV antibodies every year and Dr Gallo, who patented his "test", gets a royalty for every one. Luc Montagnier, Gallo's partner in the HIV-causes-Aids theory, has since admitted in 1989: "HIV is not capable of causing the destruction of the immune system which is seen in people with Aids". Nearly 500 scientists across the world agree with him. So does Dr Robert E Wilner, author of the book 'The Deadly Deception. The Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause Aids'.

part 1 The virus was never isolated. And Koch's Postulates were never fulfilled. This is a checklist used to determine that a certain pathogen causes a certain disease. It involves isolating a pathogen from animal 1, sick with given symptoms. The pathogen is then injected in well animal 2. If well animal 2 becomes sick with the same symptoms as the sick animal 1 then the pathogen must be present in the now sick animal 2 right? The pathogen is then isolated from sick animal 2 and compared with that discovered in original sick animal 1. All animals with the disease must contain the same pathogen, usually in great abundance; otherwise symptoms do not generally occur. Unfortunately none of the first AIDS patients at the NIH 25yrs ago contained any 'virus'. So HIV was never isolated. That’s a big deal. It means: All positives are false positives. So how did they calibrate a test? They had no virus seen or had. They decided to use antibodies instead. They decided that although there was no HIV in the AIDS patients there must be an anti-body specifically made against it!? Then they used not whole antibodies, just shards – or proteins. A group of (10 in Western Blot) proteins. They soon found that the proteins were occurring in everyone, even those without AIDS and those outside the 'risk groups'. Yes. Everyone is positive at that point! But don’t worry, it’s ok! It’s positive for a never-seen-virus (we gonna be ok!). The first HIV anti-body test they developed tested 30pc of non risk group persons positive. To this day a questionnaire still accompanies every HIV test performed, to be sure about risk group status, ethnicity and behaviour issues before handing out a verdict. How else do you know is a person is in a risk group? Just ask them! All very thorough and scientific. Thankfully the first prototype was rejected by the US blood bank management system as a bunch of crock.

Part 2 So they went back to the lab to ‘re-calibrate’ ie they simply moved the line: the limit or level of proteins (that occur in everyone) well up, much higher than before and decided beyond this point it was HIV and below not so much or perhaps ‘indeterminate’. So now it caught no one in the non-risk groups too often. Patent: K’ching! But by agitating their early samples with cortisones, the human stress hormone, what they had effectively created was a measuring device for the relative levels of physiological stress in people. This group of proteins increase in the body as a response to stressors. Physiological stress occurs as a result of poor lifestyle, stressful situations such as jail, war etc, lingering hunger and malnutrition (Band Aid 1984, We Are the World 1985), and pre-existing (tropical) disease. Its all fight or flight. Oh, yes, and pregnancy. Ladies who are having a tough life, a tough pregnancy etc are more likely to test positive the more children they have. The impact of pregnancy compounds it seems. Of course testing positive at this time is tantamount to an allegation of infidelity. And so whose baby is this anyway? Disaster. No more happy family. Over time a list of 70+ diseases have emerged as ‘cross-reacting’ with the test ie sickness will cause a spike in stress levels. This list includes TB- the original African killer disease. Remember TB? I didn’t think so. All positives are false positives.

Part 3 Hooray. So the test means you might need to relax a bit, eat more food, sanitation etc, treat your TB and change your lifestyle to moderation(everybody knows that poppers/amyl nitrite inhalant practices caused the KS and PCP 'gay AIDS' mistaken for HIV infection in the first place, right?). Lol tongue in cheek a bit. You would think treatment options would be self-evident. Food security, improved trading relations to improve standards of living. Nothing funny about 60pc of children of Uganda being under-nourished and then that same poverty being called a pathogen. It’s so Pellagra (severe vitamin B deficiency treated with ARSENIC because the altruistic believed it was a pathogen and may spread to them) all over again 1915-1935 in the Deep South. So what is the recommended treatment for the phantom? AZT: unilaterally declared a carcinogen by the state of California in 2009. Still kingpin of AIDS treatment.. .

Part 4 Package insert says side effects include death. I like to call side-effects the (un)desired known direct effects of a drug. AZT began life as a possible cancer chemo therapy drug but never made it because it was killing the human rather quite effectively. There is no safe dosage of this drug. Neverapine destroys the stomach so food cannot be absorbed or digested: outcome- a spectacular death thin as pen and out of the way of any help because it’s too late even if you stop drinking it. Side effects on the package insert: death. Favourite two drugs for treatment in Africa! All ARVs read the same. New and old, all killers costing upto US$600 a month in countries whose per capita income (PPP) is $300. In cash money its $10 a month in Uganda. The test is no declaration as it is made out to be. The drugs are the disease. Fear-mongering led people to take the drugs. Is it any wonder the only gay men alive today who were diagnosed during the original outbreak of testing are the ones who didn’t take the drugs? Or that total organ failure is the main cause of death amoung the HIV positive and medicated in the USA where they are getting the best care we suppose? The AIDS diagnosis would be outlawed and the anti-body tests recalled in a just world. It’s all been going to pot for a while it seems

part 5 No Help Coming. It’s a sequel. Testing procedure includes Rapid Tests, also known as screening tests. Blood or saliva. Package inserts do more than suggest you follow this type of test with a more technical test. That is why it is called a screening test, a crude catch-all instrument. In Africa more technical is not an option. The outbreak of testing is not very sophisticated. A Rapid Test is all you will get. Sorry for you. Elisa, they say, is prone to false positives so if 'positive' kindly consult the information supplied on the questionnaire by the patient, do another Elisa by a different manufacture or get Western Blot. Some countries do not proceed beyond Elisa, some countries will tell you a positive Elisa does not mean a person is HIV positive. Double-take!!(You might want to watch House of Numbers (2009) by Brent Leung sometime soon) So Eliza is trigger-happy, no big deal really! Because the risk group status as you declared on your questionnaire, should straighten out any confusion. Proceed and consult a Western Blot, HIV antibody testing at the top of it’s game. Pretty thorough until you realise there are 8 permutations of those 10 proteins that are considered a positive- determined by test manufactures and UN guidelines and each national health institution picks one or two as its favourite positive. So the same permutation will vary by country whether it is positive or negative? Yes. Don’t forget that questionnaire is also still in play. Some countries do not use WB ever at all by their own discretion. It's prognostic, not diagnostic some say. Awesome. It will tell you if you will die/get ill or not but does not know what you will die of! I see! Very simple. Straightforward?

part 6 and last Straightforward? Well no, an antibody test is not necessary to give an AIDS diagnosis. In their wisdom the UN at Bangui in 1985 decided a checklist was enough, a score card of weighted (pretty general) symptoms. Add up diarrhoea, fever, weigh loss of 10pc of body mass, coughing for a month or more and hey presto: you got AIDS! Sounds like the ‘consumption’ of the Victorian age, how romantic, but that is just me perhaps. It can’t be true? It is! It's an open secret. People have conferences to discuss the other side of the story all the time. Know the history. Know the context. http://www.houseofnumbers.com/site/ House of Numbers 2009 by Brent Leung http://www.science-and-aids.org/e/index.html Alternative AIDS Conference Vienna 16-17 July 2010 http://reducetheburden.org/ Liam Scheff prominent producer of Guinea Pig Kids and critical journalist http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=414722414010&comments&ref=notif¬if_t=note_comment 'All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.' Arthur Schopenhauer German philosopher (1788 – 1860)

Good for RT for exposing this massive pharmaceutical fraud. Dr. Christian is spot on when he says that in Africa “AIDS” is renaming old poverty related diseases.

Bravo to RT for having the courage to do what journalists are supposed to do! For decades, the Western media have suppressed the scientific debate surrounding the origin and treatment of AIDS.

If as Mr. Alan Berstein claimed that the "original" retrovirus that causes AIDS has been identified, that its DNA has been mapped,‘cloned’[i.e. copied] why he cannot answer the simple logical question raised by Dr. Juliana Sacher that HIV/AIDS are theorized and discussed as meaning different thing in the global south[Africa, Asia and Latin America] than in the global north? For a long time neo-liberalizers and BIG PHARMA have been able to rename a host of diseases caused by unjust economic practices- such as TB [which can be treated with anti-biotic]- as part of this mysterious disease called AIDS. This is why AIDS has come to be framed the disease of the global south. Thank you RT to for exposing this massive fraud.

Bravo to RT for allowing the public to hear that there are dissenting voices as to HIV and AIDS. Bravo to the interviewers, who asked EACH SIDE searching questions. That allowed us to see that Andrew Ball knows nothing, he could give no details for anything, whereas Sacher, Shenton, Koehnlein, Fiala had facts to quote

I consider myself a survivor of the AIDS holocaust. I witnessed first hand how many of my friends and peers who were perfectly healthy other than an unfortunate HIV+ test died taking high doses of AZT in the early 90-ties. Those who did not - are alive today and well. No one denies that AIDS exists. But HIV is clearly not the cause. Instead we have poisened thousands of healthy young men and women with AZT, Nevirapine and tolerate that pharmaceutical companies move on to push those drugs onto those that cant defend themselves: the poor in Africa, Asia, the disenfranchised in the Europe and the US. HIV+ people are discriminated against, experience social exclusion, travel restrictions in addition to being told they will die of a virus that yet has to be isolated. Since WW2 this is the biggest crime against humanity - based on greed and corruption. I applaud RT for making this step forward in reporting truthfully both sides of the coins. It is amazing to see Russia emerge in this way, whereas mainstream broadcasters and news sources in the west increasingly report 'party line' only. Thank you.

In House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic, an AIDS film like no other, the HIV/AIDS story is being rewritten. This is the first film to present the uncensored POVs of virtually all the major players; in their own settings, in their own words. It rocks the foundation upon which all conventional wisdom regarding HIV/AIDS is based. House of Numbers could well be the opening volley in a battle to bring sanity and clarity to an epidemic gone awry. Trailer: http://www.houseofnumbers.com/site/

I’ve been curious after spending long visits in Uganda over the last 6 years why "AIDS" discriminates so overwhelmingly between the races? Is it "HIV" or “HIV testing that is spreading? Is it the “HIV +” diagnoses and/or malnutrition and/or ARVs that cause immune deficiencies - relabeled “AIDS”? There are no inhibitions or limits as to what goes on in the touristy Kabalagala and city clubs and yet young people there seem to be quite healthy, apart from a small incidence of alcoholism (but no "AIDS"). Even in UK we continue to be burdened by unwanted pregnancies and STDs, and the influence of the pornography, prostitution, sex tourism, pedophilia and swingers clubbing industries. And there is still no "AIDS" scourge, after 27 years. Also how is it possible to differentiate between intrauterine malnutrition and perinatal "AIDS" (MTCT) if all the lab tests are non-specific and fraught with problems of cross reactions with antibodies from TB, malaria, pregnancy and poverty in general? Someone at the MOH told me in 2005 that there were over 6000 AIDS NGOs operating in Uganda? How come? Has it become a kind of a religion down there? WHO stands to gain? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQoNW7lOnT4

I watched a video by Dr. Leonard Horowitz , that Aids is a biological weapon . Here is the link to the video http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8674401787208020885# He also wrote a report http://tetrahedron.org/articles/aids-coverups/aids_coverups.html