Afghan war damaged USSR foreign policy – KGB Vympel veteran
Published: 25 December, 2009, 12:46
Edited: 28 December, 2009, 10:20
TAGS: Military, Russia, Middle East, Politics
On the 30th anniversary of the USSR military campaign in Afghanistan, RT military analyst Eugene Khrushchev asked KGB Vympel veteran Colonel Lev Korolkov about his views on the Soviet military involvement.
RT: What is your assessment of the Soviet military campaign in Afghanistan, back then, 30 years ago and now?
Lev Korolkov: My personal view hasn’t changed much. I believe at the moment the decision was fairly thought-through and rational. Until the end we got along well with the Afghans. There wasn’t any tragedy. The task of the military forces is to fight. Despite all the negative issues, by the time we were withdrawing, our army was the best prepared to fight a war in any conditions. And all our tasks and battle operations were performed successfully. We didn’t solve the global problem, and we couldn’t have – it was impossible. But from a military point of view, it was all performed adequately.
And we also cooperated well. We cooperated with the Main Intelligence Directorate,GRU. They held strong positions, and perfected all their military units there. But we all had our own tasks. Our operations had more to do with politics, and the Main Intelligence Directorate dealt with military operations. It was GRU Spetsnaz that actually fought the war.
What was a disaster was when we completely stopped government support. We can say we betrayed those we were fostering, so to say, and our close allies.
The Soviet Union was pulled into Afghanistan. It damaged the USSR’s foreign policy to some extent in the view of many Third World countries – mostly in the view of Islamic countries. But the damage was very, very serious. And the second thing is that the further the USSR was pulled in, the more money it spent, which should have been spent on solving problems inside the country.
RT: What are the most important consequences today of the Soviet military campaign then, 30 years ago?
LV: The consequences were different for the Soviet Union and for the rest of the world, but generally speaking they were serious and even fatal. Thirty years on, and now it’s the West involved in the same conflict with all its immense military and economic potential. The US and its allies have been fighting for a long time in Afghanistan, and not a single problem has been solved.
Russia buys nuclear power dismantling assetA Russian company specializing in the construction of nuclear power plants has bought a German firm with expertise in dismantling old plants and handling radioactive waste. |
Ovechkin, Malkin and Co. – Russia’s Olympic squad announcedRussia’s hockey coach Vyacheslav Bykov has announced his choice for the upcoming Vancouver Olympics, with stars like Aleksandr Ovechkin, Evgeny Malkin and Ilya Kovalchuk on the list. |
I totally agree, nothing has been achieved and neva will b. I dont know much about the Russian -Afghan war but i know this much all wars are brutal and the only people that suffa are the ones on da ground, people who have difficulty placing food on da table 4 their children whom are the most innocent. The US should withdraw now not send in more troops, wat is Obama playin at, doesnt he realize the situation can only get worse. We and our so called puppet leaderz need 2 unite and become 1 and demand an end to all atrocities tekin place in certain parts ov da world at this present moment in time.












The Soviet Union must have had some reason for going to war in Afghanistan, some thirty years ago, but the world has not learned the truth. Does anyone know why the Soviet Union fought and lost that war? Was Afghanistan a threat to the Soviet Union? If so, how and why. Is Afghanistan still a threat to Russia. What is the deal with Ben Laden who is supposedly hiding out in a cave in Pakistan and the whole world is not capable, after all these years, of finding and capturing him? This is all very strange.